Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 5, 2015·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Montréal Canadiens 4, Florida Panthers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

FLA winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL1123907428
FLA0411209125

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:36MTLTomas PlekanecPPAssists: Andrei Markov, Alex Galchenyuk · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:20FLAAaron EkbladPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aleksander Barkov · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:06MTLBrendan GallagherGWGAssists: P.K. Subban, Tomas Plekanec · Slap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:27MTLPA ParenteauAssists: Jeff Petry, Tomas Plekanec · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 17:42MTLDevante Smith-PellyAssists: PA Parenteau · Snap, 0.25 xG4–1
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:48FLADmitry Kulikov: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:51FLAErik Gudbranson: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 14:05FLABrandon Pirri: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 18:31MTLJeff Petry: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 0:51FLAJussi Jokinen: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 6:15MTLDale Weise: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  7. P3 3:13FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 4:29FLADerek MacKenzie: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 11:08MTLDevante Smith-Pelly: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 11:34FLAAleksander Barkov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 17:22MTLNathan Beaulieu: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Desharnais
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLFLA
28Shots on goal25
2.5Expected goals2.4
51Shot attempts58
34Faceoffs won35
7Power plays4
8Penalty minutes14
25Hits27
19Blocked shots11
0Giveaways6
2Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPlekanec – Gallagher – Galchenyuk10:45

    xG 0.79–0.08 (91%)attempts 17–4goals 1–0

  2. Parenteau – Desharnais – Smith-Pelly5:34

    xG 0.52–0.24 (68%)attempts 6–6goals 2–0

  3. Prust – Mitchell – Weise6:18

    xG 0.20–0.06 (76%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Desharnais – Eller – Smith-Pelly2:33

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – Beaulieu9:22

    xG 0.47–0.07 (87%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Markov – Subban13:37

    xG 0.52–0.37 (59%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

  3. Emelin – Beaulieu3:01

    xG 0.05–0.07 (40%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestJagr – Huberdeau – Barkov10:40

    xG 0.53–0.36 (59%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  2. Jokinen – Bolland – Hayes4:51

    xG 0.27–0.12 (69%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  3. Hayes – Pirri – Trocheck6:57

    xG 0.14–0.04 (77%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – MacKenzie – Kopecky8:01

    xG 0.15–0.37 (29%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Ekblad11:52

    xG 0.35–0.13 (72%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Petrovic11:28

    xG 0.52–0.30 (63%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Mitchell – Gudbranson8:26

    xG 0.28–0.30 (48%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.4 xGMTL 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 35/100 · #766 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

FLA winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).