Thu, Nov 5, 2015·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary
Philadelphia Flyers 1, Calgary Flames 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 72% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 08 | 19 | 08 | 02 | 127 |
| CGY | 18 | 010 | 010 | 12 | 230 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 4:40CGYJosh JoorisAssists: Mikael Backlund, Michael Frolik · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
- P2 19:24PHIMichael RafflAssists: Claude Giroux · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
- OT 0:35CGYMikael BacklundGWGAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Karri Ramo · Backhand, 0.37 xG1–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 2:29CGYJosh Jooris: Holding the stick2 min
- P1 14:02CGYJiri Hudler: Tripping2 min
- P1 16:50PHIScott Laughton: High sticking2 min
- P2 13:22PHIBrayden Schenn: Too many men on the ice2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Backlund
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestVandeVelde – White – Laughton10:15
xG 0.11–0.04 (75%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Umberger – Schenn – Couturier4:34
xG 0.08–0.04 (68%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Simmonds – Read – Couturier10:56
xG 0.17–0.26 (39%)attempts 19–6goals 0–0
- Lecavalier – Umberger – Schenn2:37
xG 0.02–0.17 (10%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Streit – Del Zotto19:28
xG 0.27–0.33 (45%)attempts 17–15goals 0–0
- Manning – Gudas13:13
xG 0.12–0.32 (27%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0
- Schultz – Schenn14:21
xG 0.30–0.92 (25%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestJones – Frolik – Backlund3:20
xG 0.70–0.09 (89%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Stajan – Jones – Colborne7:07
xG 0.35–0.18 (66%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0
- Hudler – Frolik – Backlund10:23
xG 0.16–0.11 (60%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1
- Grant – Jooris – Bennett3:00
xG 0.08–0.04 (67%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGiordano – Brodie20:29
xG 1.24–0.52 (70%)attempts 16–19goals 1–1
- Russell – Hamilton14:39
xG 0.43–0.13 (77%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0
- Engelland – Wideman10:56
xG 0.24–0.13 (64%)attempts 6–18goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 72% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CGY − PHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).