Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 14, 2015·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Chicago Blackhawks 4, St. Louis Blues 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 50% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11021314427
STL09212010231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:10CHIDuncan KeithAssists: Teuvo Teravainen · Slap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:32STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Alexander Steen, Jori Lehtera · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:16STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Jori Lehtera · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:17CHITrevor van RiemsdykAssists: Marian Hossa, Marko Dano · Slap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:55CHIPatrick KanePPGWGAssists: Artemi Panarin, Artem Anisimov · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:13CHIArtem AnisimovENAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.67 xG4–2
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 1:11STLJoel Edmundson: Illegal check to head2 min
  2. P1 15:42STLJay Bouwmeester: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 19:39CHIJonathan Toews: Illegal check to head2 min
  4. P2 2:37CHIBrandon Mashinter: Elbowing2 min
  5. P2 3:21STLDavid Backes: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 3:21STLDavid Backes: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 3:21CHIJonathan Toews: Fighting5 min · PPG
  8. P2 7:16CHIMarko Dano: Boarding2 min
  9. P2 9:59CHIPatrick Kane: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 9:59STLAlex Pietrangelo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P2 12:16CHINiklas Hjalmarsson: Hooking2 min
  12. P2 18:40STLTroy Brouwer: Slashing2 min · PPG
  13. P3 0:51CHIDuncan Keith: High sticking2 min
  14. P3 4:40STLScottie Upshall: High sticking2 min
  15. P3 19:56CHITrevor van Riemsdyk: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win54% to win
← CHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISTL
27Shots on goal31
3.0Expected goals3.0
45Shot attempts49
35Faceoffs won28
5Power plays6
19Penalty minutes17
6Hits25
5Blocked shots12
0Giveaways3
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestMashinter – Garbutt – Kero4:23

    xG 0.14–0.03 (84%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Kruger – Shaw – Teravainen8:10

    xG 0.34–0.35 (50%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  3. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin10:23

    xG 0.20–0.22 (48%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Hossa – Toews – Dano4:59

    xG 0.08–0.22 (26%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRozsival – Daley7:10

    xG 0.66–0.34 (66%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  2. Keith – Seabrook2:29

    xG 0.12–0.06 (66%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Hjalmarsson12:55

    xG 0.48–0.51 (48%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Lehtera – Tarasenko9:36

    xG 0.62–0.05 (92%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Gomez – Paajarvi – Jaskin2:52

    xG 0.44–0.17 (73%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Upshall – Backes – Fabbri4:30

    xG 0.13–0.24 (36%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Reaves – Jaskin4:13

    xG 0.03–0.19 (12%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Parayko4:57

    xG 0.33–0.07 (82%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Edmundson6:13

    xG 0.38–0.13 (75%)attempts 10–2goals 0–1

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo11:42

    xG 0.42–0.55 (43%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.0 xGCHI 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #330 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 50% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).