Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 17, 2015·TD Garden, Boston

San Jose Sharks 5, Boston Bruins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 61% of the time.

BOS winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS2931405528
BOS2919111429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:42SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Melker Karlsson, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:20BOSTyler RandellAssists: Dennis Seidenberg · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:50BOSBrad MarchandPPAssists: Zdeno Chara, Brett Connolly · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:08SJSJoonas DonskoiAssists: Paul Martin, Tommy Wingels · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–2
  5. P2 1:53BOSLoui ErikssonAssists: David Krejci, Dennis Seidenberg · Snap, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 5:56SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Joe Thornton, Joe Pavelski · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P2 8:56SJSPatrick MarleauPPAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.33 xG4–3
  8. P2 9:21SJSJoe ThorntonPPGWGAssists: Joe Pavelski, Brent Burns · Snap, 0.10 xG5–3
  9. P3 6:28BOSPatrice BergeronPPAssists: Ryan Spooner, David Krejci · Snap, 0.01 xG5–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:06SJSJoel Ward: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 6:28BOSAdam McQuaid: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:18BOSTyler Randell: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:07BOSRyan Spooner: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 11:16BOSTyler Randell: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 6:07SJSBrent Burns: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 12:40SJSJoe Thornton: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 17:20BOSBrad Marchand: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win54% to win
← SJS attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Pavelski
  2. P1 20:00Pavelski won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSBOS
28Shots on goal29
2.2Expected goals1.7
48Shot attempts51
28Faceoffs won33
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
21Hits33
12Blocked shots13
8Giveaways8
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Karlsson12:30

    xG 0.54–0.15 (78%)attempts 12–9goals 2–0

  2. Wingels – Donskoi – Hertl12:20

    xG 0.57–0.21 (73%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Ward – Nieto8:58

    xG 0.14–0.08 (64%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Marleau – Ward – Tierney2:19

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Dillon2:03

    xG 0.40–0.05 (89%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Vlasic – Braun14:34

    xG 0.37–0.28 (57%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  3. Dillon – Mueller7:43

    xG 0.09–0.16 (35%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. Eriksson – Krejci – Vatrano13:18

    xG 0.13–0.10 (57%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Marchand – Hayes – Spooner6:53

    xG 0.24–0.24 (51%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Bergeron – Marchand – Hayes5:39

    xG 0.06–0.10 (38%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Beleskey – Connolly – Kemppainen6:11

    xG 0.06–0.11 (36%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeidenberg – Krug3:56

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  2. Chara – McQuaid2:23

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Seidenberg – Miller11:22

    xG 0.32–0.42 (43%)attempts 6–11goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 1.7 xGSJS 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #77 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.31 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 61% of the time.

BOS winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).