Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 19, 2015·TD Garden, Boston

Minnesota Wild 2, Boston Bruins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 78% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN0102808226
BOS110218110438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:30BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Brett Connolly · Wrap-around, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:12MINJason ZuckerAssists: Mikko Koivu, Nino Niederreiter · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:37BOSLoui ErikssonAssists: David Krejci, Adam McQuaid · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:21BOSLoui ErikssonPPGWGAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:37MINJordan SchroederAssists: Ryan Suter, Ryan Carter · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:14BOSLoui ErikssonAssists: David Krejci, Matt Beleskey · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 0:57BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 0:57MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 0:57BOSJimmy Hayes: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 5:34MINBrett Bulmer: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 5:34BOSMatt Beleskey: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 5:34BOSMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 5:34MINBrett Bulmer: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 6:35BOSZac Rinaldo: Interference2 min
  9. P2 1:46MINJason Zucker: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 2:31MINMikael Granlund: High sticking2 min
  11. P2 11:02MINThomas Vanek: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 15:53BOSBrad Marchand: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 18:15MINBrett Bulmer: Too many men on the ice2 min
  14. P3 19:21BOSColin Miller: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 19:21MINRyan Carter: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 19:21BOSTyler Randell: Roughing2 min
  17. P3 19:21BOSTorey Krug: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win54% to win
← MIN attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kemppainen won the faceoff against Coyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBOS
26Shots on goal38
1.7Expected goals3.4
52Shot attempts61
26Faceoffs won22
3Power plays4
19Penalty minutes29
23Hits29
10Blocked shots16
16Giveaways11
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Schroeder – Coyle4:19

    xG 0.60–0.04 (94%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Schroeder – Coyle4:54

    xG 0.15–0.06 (71%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  3. Koivu – Zucker – Niederreiter14:50

    xG 0.43–0.40 (52%)attempts 12–13goals 1–1

  4. Pominville – Carter – Granlund3:48

    xG 0.07–0.08 (46%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon11:59

    xG 0.54–0.24 (70%)attempts 15–10goals 2–1

  2. Prosser – Dumba4:51

    xG 0.08–0.06 (54%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Dumba8:51

    xG 0.21–0.31 (40%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson – Krejci – Beleskey8:50

    xG 0.36–0.01 (97%)attempts 11–2goals 1–0

  2. Spooner – Connolly – Kemppainen4:31

    xG 0.28–0.07 (80%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Rinaldo – Randell – Kemppainen2:55

    xG 0.03–0.03 (57%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Eriksson – Krejci – Vatrano2:09

    xG 0.01–0.02 (41%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeidenberg – Miller10:43

    xG 0.47–0.16 (75%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Chara – Trotman15:56

    xG 0.36–0.23 (62%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Chara – Miller3:18

    xG 0.08–0.35 (18%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.4 xGMIN 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #640 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 78% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).