Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 5, 2015·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Los Angeles Kings 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 84% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT032819320
LAK01041819537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:26LAKDrew DoughtyPPAssists: Jake Muzzin, Jeff Carter · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:53LAKChristian EhrhoffAssists: Marian Gaborik · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:57LAKMilan LucicAssists: Jake Muzzin · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:20PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Brian Dumoulin · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:18LAKJake MuzzinGWGAssists: Dustin Brown, Anze Kopitar · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:01PITOlli MaattaAssists: Chris Kunitz, Beau Bennett · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 2:39PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Chris Kunitz · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:45LAKMilan LucicENAssists: Drew Doughty · Wrist, 0.78 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 15:32LAKNicholas Shore: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 18:53PITRob Scuderi: Holding2 min
  3. P2 2:22PITRob Scuderi: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  4. P3 5:31LAKKyle Clifford: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 8:45PITNick Bonino: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 11:33PITBen Lovejoy: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win54% to win
← PIT attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carter won the faceoff against Cullen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITLAK
20Shots on goal37
1.6Expected goals3.7
36Shot attempts67
30Faceoffs won29
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
13Hits23
18Blocked shots10
9Giveaways13
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Bennett5:05

    xG 0.39–0.34 (54%)attempts 6–3goals 2–0

  2. Cullen – Fehr – Plotnikov8:44

    xG 0.22–0.24 (47%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Hornqvist – Bonino – Bennett5:31

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Kessel – Perron12:21

    xG 0.36–0.47 (44%)attempts 9–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestLovejoy – Dumoulin17:16

    xG 0.89–0.69 (56%)attempts 16–19goals 2–1

  2. Scuderi – Warsofsky12:03

    xG 0.22–0.37 (38%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

  3. Cole – Maatta16:53

    xG 0.20–1.02 (17%)attempts 7–19goals 1–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Andreoff – Shore11:40

    xG 0.74–0.06 (93%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Lucic – Toffoli10:31

    xG 0.56–0.24 (70%)attempts 14–7goals 1–2

  3. Gaborik – Kopitar – Pearson11:58

    xG 0.58–0.55 (51%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  4. Clifford – Nolan – Weal6:41

    xG 0.05–0.22 (19%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Martinez14:43

    xG 0.67–0.33 (67%)attempts 18–11goals 2–2

  2. Doughty – McNabb19:39

    xG 0.70–0.64 (52%)attempts 17–12goals 0–1

  3. Muzzin – Doughty2:12

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.7 xGPIT 1.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #276 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.24 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 84% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).