Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 6, 2015·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 2, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 65% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF17111016234
EDM3911306428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:58BUFJack EichelAssists: Brian Gionta, Jamie McGinn · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:36EDMTeddy PurcellAssists: Taylor Hall, Leon Draisaitl · Deflected, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:06EDMJordan EberleAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:55EDMTaylor HallPPGWGAssists: Teddy Purcell, Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:22BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Zach Bogosian, Carlo Colaiacovo · Backhand, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:43EDMLuke GazdicAssists: Oscar Klefbom, Anton Lander · Wrist, 0.48 xG2–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 12:03EDMMatt Hendricks: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 12:03BUFZemgus Girgensons: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 18:39BUFJosh Gorges: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:20EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 7:37EDMBrandon Davidson: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 11:30EDMEric Gryba: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:07EDMTaylor Hall: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 11:45BUFEvander Kane: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 11:45EDMTaylor Hall: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win54% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Nugent-Hopkins
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
34Shots on goal28
2.4Expected goals3.2
56Shot attempts50
33Faceoffs won39
4Power plays1
6Penalty minutes12
25Hits25
13Blocked shots11
6Giveaways9
7Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Gionta – McGinn – Eichel8:54

    xG 0.29–0.26 (52%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Legwand – Foligno – Deslauriers6:48

    xG 0.13–0.10 (55%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Moulson – Larsson – Girgensons5:30

    xG 0.11–0.55 (17%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  4. O'Reilly – Kane – Reinhart10:58

    xG 0.14–0.75 (16%)attempts 6–15goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Franson – McCabe11:36

    xG 0.40–0.46 (47%)attempts 9–10goals 1–1

  2. Gorges – Ristolainen16:46

    xG 0.45–0.89 (33%)attempts 10–18goals 0–0

  3. Colaiacovo – Bogosian13:49

    xG 0.20–1.11 (15%)attempts 9–13goals 0–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestPurcell – Hall – Draisaitl14:38

    xG 0.87–0.23 (79%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  2. Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins – Khaira12:16

    xG 0.73–0.29 (72%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  3. Gazdic – Lander – Pakarinen3:59

    xG 0.59–0.22 (73%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  4. Hendricks – Korpikoski – Letestu7:29

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Klefbom13:44

    xG 1.15–0.54 (68%)attempts 16–10goals 1–0

  2. Gryba – Davidson14:38

    xG 0.65–0.12 (84%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  3. Sekera – Nurse14:10

    xG 0.62–0.37 (62%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.2 xGBUF 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 45/100 · #665 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 65% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).