Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 8, 2015·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

New York Islanders 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsNYI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NYI2915011011426
PHI115117113010346

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:55NYIFrans NielsenAssists: Anders Lee, Johnny Boychuk · Snap, 0.26 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:12PHIPierre-Edouard BellemareSHAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:43NYIBrock NelsonPPAssists: Nick Leddy, Kyle Okposo · Slap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:14NYIFrans NielsenAssists: Josh Bailey, Nick Leddy · Snap, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 4:09PHIRyan WhiteAssists: R.J. Umberger, Scott Laughton · Snap, 0.22 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:02PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Brayden Schenn, Brandon Manning · Slap, 0.06 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  2. 2. NYI Frans Nielsen stopped
  3. 3. PHI Wayne Simmonds stopped
  4. 4. NYI Kyle Okposo scored
  5. 5. PHI Evgeny Medvedev stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:47PHIEvgeny Medvedev: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:11NYIJohn Tavares: Illegal check to head2 min
  3. P2 12:56NYIMarek Zidlicky: Interference2 min
  4. OT 2:53PHIJakub Voracek: Interference2 min
  5. OT 2:53NYIMatt Martin: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win54% to win
← NYI attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Tavares
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYIPHI
26Shots on goal46
2.4Expected goals4.8
51Shot attempts89
32Faceoffs won32
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
34Hits30
24Blocked shots15
10Giveaways11
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. Grabovski – Kulemin – Strome8:58

    xG 0.65–0.64 (50%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

  2. Clutterbuck – Martin – Cizikas5:19

    xG 0.11–0.43 (20%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Nielsen – Bailey – Lee9:28

    xG 0.48–0.82 (37%)attempts 11–15goals 2–1

  4. Okposo – Tavares – Nelson14:08

    xG 0.19–0.55 (26%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoychuk – Hamonic2:52

    xG 0.26–0.03 (89%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  2. Hamonic – Leddy15:43

    xG 1.02–1.00 (50%)attempts 20–22goals 1–2

  3. Boychuk – de Haan16:46

    xG 0.38–0.81 (32%)attempts 14–21goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVandeVelde – Voracek – Bellemare10:52

    xG 1.68–0.55 (75%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1

  2. Simmonds – Read – Couturier14:13

    xG 0.55–0.16 (77%)attempts 20–12goals 0–0

  3. Umberger – White – Laughton9:05

    xG 0.56–0.35 (61%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  4. Giroux – Schenn – Raffl11:17

    xG 0.47–0.49 (49%)attempts 14–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Del Zotto17:22

    xG 1.86–0.28 (87%)attempts 24–16goals 1–1

  2. Schultz – Medvedev17:23

    xG 0.91–0.26 (78%)attempts 20–15goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Medvedev2:06

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.8 xGNYI 2.4 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHINYI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #227 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
NYI 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsNYI wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − NYI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).