Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 21, 2015·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

St. Louis Blues 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 68% of the time.

PHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL2151905329
PHI0821429431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:16STLRobby FabbriAssists: Dmitrij Jaskin · Snap, 0.32 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:51STLKevin ShattenkirkPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Paul Stastny · Slap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:11STLMagnus PaajarviAssists: Paul Stastny · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–0
  4. P2 10:03PHIChris VandeVeldeSHAssists: Pierre-Edouard Bellemare · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:13PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:51PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Deflected, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P3 16:47PHIEvgeny MedvedevGWGAssists: Ryan White, Chris VandeVelde · Slap, 0.09 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:11STLMagnus Paajarvi: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 14:03PHIJakub Voracek: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:07STLJoel Edmundson: Holding2 min
  4. P1 18:07PHIRadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 9:16PHIClaude Giroux: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 19:30STLJori Lehtera: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 4:34STLScott Gomez: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win54% to win
← STL attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLPHI
29Shots on goal31
2.1Expected goals3.2
55Shot attempts63
29Faceoffs won35
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
31Hits43
20Blocked shots15
9Giveaways8
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Jaskin – Fabbri9:47

    xG 0.52–0.14 (78%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  2. Stastny – Paajarvi – Tarasenko3:04

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Steen – Backes – Brouwer3:01

    xG 0.03–0.06 (34%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Backes – Brouwer – Paajarvi7:46

    xG 0.17–0.21 (45%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Pietrangelo15:14

    xG 0.67–0.57 (54%)attempts 14–19goals 1–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Edmundson10:04

    xG 0.56–0.51 (52%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1

  3. Gunnarsson – Parayko8:35

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Read – Laughton8:01

    xG 0.41–0.15 (73%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Voracek – Simmonds – Couturier11:25

    xG 0.29–0.15 (67%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. VandeVelde – White – Bellemare11:39

    xG 0.40–0.49 (45%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  4. Giroux – Schenn – Raffl9:31

    xG 0.24–0.54 (31%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchenn – Gostisbehere11:59

    xG 0.89–0.32 (74%)attempts 15–15goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Medvedev2:08

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Medvedev3:13

    xG 0.14–0.15 (47%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.2 xGSTL 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #152 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 68% of the time.

PHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).