Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 21, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Dallas Stars 6, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL01131538634
MIN211010114335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:57MINJared SpurgeonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:16MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Justin Fontaine, Nino Niederreiter · Snap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:59DALJordie BennAssists: Jason Spezza · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:30DALVernon FiddlerPPAssists: Patrick Eaves, Alex Goligoski · Tip-in, 0.22 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:29DALTyler SeguinAssists: Patrick Sharp, Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:41DALAntoine RousselGWGAssists: Johnny Oduya · Backhand, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 10:26MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Charlie Coyle, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.44 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:07DALCody EakinENUnassisted · Backhand, 0.43 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:46DALVernon FiddlerENAssists: Tyler Seguin · Wrist, 0.64 xG6–3
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 11:52DALPatrick Sharp: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 11:52MINMikael Granlund: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 12:24MINMikko Koivu: Interference2 min
  4. P2 16:32MINJared Spurgeon: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win54% to win
← DAL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Seguin won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALMIN
34Shots on goal35
3.2Expected goals2.9
58Shot attempts55
33Faceoffs won34
2Power plays0
2Penalty minutes6
19Hits19
11Blocked shots15
5Giveaways7
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestSharp – Benn – Seguin7:23

    xG 0.41–0.19 (68%)attempts 14–6goals 1–1

  2. Fiddler – Eaves – Nichushkin6:44

    xG 0.09–0.05 (67%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – Hemsky – Benn2:42

    xG 0.02–0.04 (30%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Spezza – Hemsky – Janmark4:54

    xG 0.19–0.27 (41%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Klingberg11:22

    xG 0.55–0.31 (64%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  2. Benn – Jokipakka7:56

    xG 0.26–0.16 (62%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Oduya – Demers12:29

    xG 0.21–0.72 (22%)attempts 11–17goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Niederreiter – Fontaine7:13

    xG 0.37–0.16 (70%)attempts 14–10goals 2–0

  2. Koivu – Vanek – Zucker9:04

    xG 0.48–0.33 (59%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

  3. Stoll – Porter – Carter5:52

    xG 0.12–0.09 (56%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Parise – Granlund10:06

    xG 0.24–0.40 (38%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Prosser4:48

    xG 0.47–0.07 (87%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba3:40

    xG 0.02–0.03 (42%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon13:35

    xG 0.41–0.49 (45%)attempts 17–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.9 xGDAL 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #199 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.62 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).