Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 26, 2015·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Dallas Stars 2, St. Louis Blues 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 67% of the time.

STL winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
DAL0721105014224
STL06118111025337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 6:18STLAlexander SteenPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Vladimir Tarasenko · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:15DALColton SceviourAssists: Cody Eakin, Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:23DALTyler SeguinAssists: Patrick Sharp, Alex Goligoski · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P3 18:10STLRobby FabbriAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, David Backes · Slap, 0.11 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Alexander Steen scored
  2. 2. DAL Tyler Seguin stopped
  3. 3. STL Vladimir Tarasenko scored
  4. 4. DAL Jamie Benn scored
  5. 5. STL Kevin Shattenkirk stopped
  6. 6. DAL Patrick Sharp scored
  7. 7. STL Robby Fabbri stopped
  8. 8. DAL Colton Sceviour stopped
  9. 9. STL Jori Lehtera scored
  10. 10. DAL Jason Spezza scored
  11. 11. STL Magnus Paajarvi stopped
  12. 12. DAL John Klingberg stopped
  13. 13. STL Dmitrij Jaskin scored
  14. 14. DAL Patrick Eaves scored
  15. 15. STL Troy Brouwer stopped
  16. 16. DAL Jordie Benn stopped
  17. 17. STL David Backes scored
  18. 18. DAL Vernon Fiddler stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 12:35STLRobert Bortuzzo: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 1:17DALAlex Goligoski: Holding2 min
  3. P2 5:53DALMattias Janmark: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 19:35DALJason Demers: Interference2 min
  5. P3 14:09DALMattias Janmark: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win54% to win
← DAL attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Fiddler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALSTL
24Shots on goal37
1.6Expected goals2.5
37Shot attempts68
34Faceoffs won26
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
15Hits28
20Blocked shots9
2Giveaways3
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestSpezza – Eaves – Janmark3:48

    xG 0.36–0.09 (81%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  2. Fiddler – Eaves – Janmark4:37

    xG 0.09–0.02 (78%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Hemsky – Fiddler – Nichushkin2:41

    xG 0.02–0.10 (19%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Spezza – Hemsky – Nichushkin8:30

    xG 0.26–0.35 (43%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenn – Jokipakka11:10

    xG 0.47–0.26 (64%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Klingberg16:59

    xG 0.48–0.36 (57%)attempts 11–14goals 2–0

  3. Oduya – Demers18:06

    xG 0.50–0.66 (43%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Jaskin – Fabbri3:17

    xG 0.18–0.03 (87%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Stastny – Paajarvi – Tarasenko13:02

    xG 0.49–0.53 (48%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  3. Reaves – Caron – Jaskin4:31

    xG 0.09–0.15 (39%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  4. Upshall – Lehtera – Fabbri5:24

    xG 0.04–0.17 (19%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Shattenkirk2:22

    xG 0.21–0.15 (58%)attempts 5–2goals 1–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo16:24

    xG 0.27–0.25 (51%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  3. Shattenkirk – Parayko13:58

    xG 0.48–0.57 (46%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.5 xGDAL 1.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #225 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.18 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 67% of the time.

STL winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).