Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 29, 2015·TD Garden, Boston

Ottawa Senators 3, Boston Bruins 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 53% of the time.

BOS winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT16113113332
BOS21311549737

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:01BOSJimmy HayesAssists: Kevan Miller · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:31OTTChris NeilAssists: Shane Prince, Max McCormick · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:25BOSPatrice BergeronPPAssists: Torey Krug, Ryan Spooner · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:21BOSMatt BeleskeyPPAssists: Brett Connolly, Brad Marchand · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:51OTTMika ZibanejadAssists: Chris Neil, Shane Prince · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 2:38BOSPatrice BergeronPPGWGAssists: Torey Krug, Seth Griffith · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:22OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Erik Karlsson, Marc Methot · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:49BOSJimmy HayesAssists: Max Talbot, Loui Eriksson · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–5
  9. P3 16:40BOSMatt BeleskeyAssists: Ryan Spooner, Loui Eriksson · Snap, 0.05 xG3–6
  10. P3 19:59BOSJimmy HayesPPAssists: Max Talbot, Dennis Seidenberg · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–7
Penalties (25)
  1. P1 10:04BOSRyan Spooner: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:02OTTMax McCormick: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:22OTTChris Wideman: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:55OTTChris Neil: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 3:35BOSZdeno Chara: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 10:45OTTDave Dziurzynski: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P2 13:14OTTMark Borowiecki: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:14BOSZdeno Chara: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 19:02OTTKyle Turris: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 19:02BOSBrett Connolly: Embellishment2 min
  11. P3 1:54OTTMark Stone: Illegal check to head2 min · PPG
  12. P3 7:58BOSLoui Eriksson: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 9:55BOSBrad Marchand: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 12:26OTTChris Wideman: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 18:57OTTMax McCormick: Fighting5 min · PPG
  16. P3 18:57BOSLandon Ferraro: Fighting5 min
  17. P3 19:33OTTChris Neil: Roughing2 min
  18. P3 19:33OTTChris Neil: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 19:33OTTMark Borowiecki: Misconduct10 min
  20. P3 19:33OTTDave Dziurzynski: Fighting5 min
  21. P3 19:33BOSAdam McQuaid: Misconduct10 min
  22. P3 19:33BOSZac Rinaldo: Fighting5 min
  23. P3 19:33BOSKevan Miller: Misconduct10 min
  24. P3 19:33BOSMatt Beleskey: Misconduct10 min
  25. P3 19:33OTTZack Smith: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win54% to win
← OTT attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Turris won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTBOS
32Shots on goal37
2.8Expected goals2.6
66Shot attempts63
32Faceoffs won36
4Power plays7
58Penalty minutes52
36Hits28
17Blocked shots19
15Giveaways13
10Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeil – McCormick – Prince4:33

    xG 0.72–0.07 (92%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Neil – Prince – Zibanejad3:21

    xG 0.34–0.01 (97%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Turris – Stone – McCormick3:22

    xG 0.13–0.08 (64%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  4. Chiasson – Dziurzynski – Pageau2:14

    xG 0.06–0.08 (41%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWiercioch – Wideman3:06

    xG 0.78–0.02 (97%)attempts 9–1goals 1–0

  2. Wiercioch – Borowiecki5:27

    xG 0.33–0.14 (70%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  3. Karlsson – Wiercioch5:31

    xG 0.24–0.11 (69%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestTalbot – Hayes – Rinaldo9:24

    xG 0.22–0.13 (62%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Beleskey – Spooner7:27

    xG 0.29–0.31 (49%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  3. Bergeron – Marchand – Griffith8:53

    xG 0.19–0.30 (39%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  4. Ferraro – Connolly – Vatrano7:41

    xG 0.06–0.79 (7%)attempts 4–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Seidenberg12:26

    xG 0.74–0.35 (68%)attempts 16–15goals 1–1

  2. McQuaid – Krug10:03

    xG 0.10–0.34 (22%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  3. Miller – Morrow10:59

    xG 0.23–0.94 (20%)attempts 11–13goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 2.6 xGOTT 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #250 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 53% of the time.

BOS winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).