Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 29, 2015·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Nashville Predators 3, St. Louis Blues 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NSH170172900333
STL17171516425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:38STLDmitrij JaskinAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.32 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:00NSHMattias EkholmSHAssists: Mike Fisher · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:04STLRobby FabbriAssists: Jori Lehtera, Dmitrij Jaskin · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:55STLKevin ShattenkirkAssists: Jori Lehtera, Colton Parayko · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:08NSHShea WeberAssists: Roman Josi, Carter Hutton · Snap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:28NSHColin WilsonAssists: Ryan Ellis, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:01STLAlexander SteenGWGAssists: Paul Stastny, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 12:22NSHSeth Jones: Holding2 min
  2. P2 0:42STLKevin Shattenkirk: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 7:06STLColton Parayko: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 12:47NSHRyan Ellis: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 4:05STLAlexander Steen: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 13:31NSHMike Ribeiro: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win54% to win
← NSH attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHSTL
33Shots on goal25
3.5Expected goals2.7
58Shot attempts55
40Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
34Hits24
19Blocked shots11
1Giveaways2
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Nystrom – Watson8:25

    xG 0.38–0.05 (88%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Neal – Jarnkrok – Salomaki5:30

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Fisher – Wilson – Arvidsson6:14

    xG 0.58–0.43 (57%)attempts 6–5goals 0–2

  4. Neal – Jarnkrok – Forsberg3:36

    xG 0.12–0.02 (87%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi17:31

    xG 0.99–0.32 (76%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm11:27

    xG 0.44–0.14 (76%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0

  3. Ekholm – Jones2:43

    xG 0.05–0.01 (89%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Backes – Brouwer – Paajarvi2:27

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Steen – Backes – Brouwer11:00

    xG 0.05–0.19 (19%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  3. Brodziak – Reaves – Caron8:00

    xG 0.18–0.35 (34%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Lehtera – Jaskin – Fabbri8:59

    xG 0.39–0.60 (39%)attempts 7–8goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGunnarsson – Bortuzzo8:52

    xG 0.20–0.07 (75%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Gunnarsson – Parayko2:34

    xG 0.03–0.06 (31%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo18:20

    xG 0.50–0.71 (41%)attempts 11–18goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.7 xGNSH 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #155 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).