Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 30, 2015·Amalie Arena, Tampa

New York Rangers 5, Tampa Bay Lightning 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 62% of the time.

TBL winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NYR1815313526
TBL1511007222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:53NYRDan BoyleAssists: Keith Yandle, Dominic Moore · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:35TBLJonathan MarchessaultPPAssists: Anton Stralman, Nikita Kucherov · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:56NYRMats ZuccarelloAssists: J.T. Miller, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:51TBLAnton StralmanPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:16NYRDominic MooreGWGAssists: Viktor Stalberg · Backhand, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:39NYRViktor StalbergENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.43 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:27NYRRick NashENAssists: Jesper Fast · Wrist, 0.76 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 6:27NYRTanner Glass: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 8:19TBLJonathan Marchessault: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 10:18NYRChris Kreider: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 15:57NYRRick Nash: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 4:28TBLMatt Carle: Interference2 min
  6. P2 9:30TBLVictor Hedman: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 10:19NYRRyan McDonagh: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 18:37NYRTanner Glass: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win54% to win
← NYR attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Stepan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRTBL
26Shots on goal22
2.6Expected goals2.1
52Shot attempts51
28Faceoffs won27
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
27Hits22
15Blocked shots16
6Giveaways10
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestMoore – Glass – Stalberg7:21

    xG 0.35–0.20 (63%)attempts 6–8goals 2–0

  2. Kreider – Lindberg – Etem7:44

    xG 0.19–0.22 (46%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Nash – Stepan – Fast10:41

    xG 0.18–0.25 (42%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Zuccarello – Miller12:08

    xG 0.18–0.34 (34%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Klein – Staal6:13

    xG 0.25–0.22 (54%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  2. Klein – Yandle4:53

    xG 0.17–0.21 (45%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Staal – Girardi3:11

    xG 0.03–0.08 (27%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestCallahan – Stamkos – Namestnikov9:16

    xG 0.52–0.09 (85%)attempts 14–5goals 0–1

  2. Filppula – Brown – Paquette9:53

    xG 0.22–0.05 (83%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Johnson – Kucherov10:12

    xG 0.29–0.32 (47%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  4. Boyle – Marchessault – Drouin6:01

    xG 0.13–0.18 (42%)attempts 4–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestCoburn – Carle7:21

    xG 0.35–0.07 (83%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  2. Coburn – Hedman3:00

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – Hedman14:01

    xG 0.35–0.20 (64%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.1 xGNYR 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #385 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.81 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 62% of the time.

TBL winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).