Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 31, 2015·Pepsi Center, Denver

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Colorado Avalanche 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 76% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI11121701114443
COL191511303330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:04COLCarl SoderbergPPAssists: Alex Tanguay, Francois Beauchemin · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:32CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Patrick Kane, Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:07CHIAndrew DesjardinsAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Phillip Danault · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:20CHIPatrick KanePPAssists: Artemi Panarin, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P2 11:32COLCody McLeodAssists: Matt Duchene, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:05COLErik JohnsonAssists: Matt Duchene, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:29CHIJonathan ToewsPPGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.28 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:46CHITrevor van Riemsdyk: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:29COLJarome Iginla: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 3:58COLBlake Comeau: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:37COLJohn Mitchell: Interference2 min
  5. P2 9:18CHIAndrew Shaw: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 3:01CHIBrent Seabrook: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 9:04COLFrancois Beauchemin: Interference2 min
  8. P3 12:42COLAlex Tanguay: Holding2 min
  9. OT 2:43COLJarome Iginla: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win54% to win
← CHI attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Mitchell won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICOL
43Shots on goal30
3.4Expected goals1.9
72Shot attempts57
26Faceoffs won31
6Power plays3
6Penalty minutes12
13Hits27
13Blocked shots18
3Giveaways5
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDesjardins – Danault – Teravainen10:53

    xG 0.60–0.13 (83%)attempts 16–6goals 1–1

  2. Hossa – Toews – Shaw11:20

    xG 0.45–0.29 (60%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Mashinter – Garbutt – Rasmussen4:21

    xG 0.10–0.03 (79%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin10:21

    xG 0.39–0.54 (42%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Hjalmarsson14:54

    xG 0.77–0.24 (76%)attempts 21–14goals 1–0

  2. Scuderi – van Riemsdyk3:30

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook2:43

    xG 0.10–0.07 (60%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Mitchell – Duchene – Martinsen12:27

    xG 0.33–0.30 (52%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  2. McLeod – Skille – Grigorenko4:44

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Tanguay – MacKinnon11:42

    xG 0.38–0.41 (48%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1

  4. Comeau – Soderberg – Landeskog11:00

    xG 0.42–0.50 (45%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Redmond15:44

    xG 0.48–0.33 (59%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

  2. Guenin – Gormley9:55

    xG 0.11–0.19 (37%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Johnson15:27

    xG 0.53–0.99 (35%)attempts 17–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.9 xGCHI 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #123 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.25 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 76% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).