Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 4, 2016·Pepsi Center, Denver

Los Angeles Kings 1, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 63% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK0718016131
COL010213210433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 6:34COLTyson BarriePPAssists: Matt Duchene, Blake Comeau · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:01LAKTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Anze Kopitar, Jake Muzzin · Slap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:20COLTyson BarrieGWGAssists: Andreas Martinsen · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:23COLMatt DuchenePPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Gabriel Landeskog · Tip-in, 0.21 xG1–3
  5. P3 13:02COLJarome IginlaPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Blake Comeau · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:29LAKChristian Ehrhoff: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 9:58LAKDwight King: Interference2 min
  3. P1 14:08COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 14:08LAKAndy Andreoff: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 14:25COLAndreas Martinsen: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 5:24LAKJake Muzzin: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 10:31COLSemyon Varlamov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  8. P2 16:26COLGabriel Landeskog: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 19:36LAKAlec Martinez: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P3 9:18COLFrancois Beauchemin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P3 12:01LAKDrew Doughty: Interference2 min · PPG
  12. P3 13:34COLGabriel Landeskog: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win54% to win
← LAK attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lewis won the faceoff against Grigorenko
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCOL
31Shots on goal33
3.8Expected goals2.9
60Shot attempts52
33Faceoffs won30
5Power plays5
15Penalty minutes15
15Hits23
9Blocked shots17
1Giveaways1
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Lewis – Lucic2:52

    xG 0.11–0.04 (75%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. Brown – Lewis – King4:00

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. King – Nolan – Andreoff2:43

    xG 0.03–0.02 (65%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Nolan – Mersch – Andreoff2:14

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – McNabb14:21

    xG 0.60–0.16 (79%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Martinez – Forbort7:35

    xG 0.26–0.04 (88%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Forbort2:02

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – MacKinnon – Martinsen9:42

    xG 0.67–0.12 (85%)attempts 17–5goals 1–0

  2. Mitchell – McLeod – Skille7:37

    xG 0.30–0.13 (69%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Comeau – Soderberg – Landeskog11:27

    xG 0.53–0.51 (51%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Iginla – Tanguay – Grigorenko7:24

    xG 0.09–0.16 (37%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Barrie14:16

    xG 0.84–0.35 (71%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Beauchemin – Johnson8:14

    xG 0.21–0.18 (55%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Holden3:27

    xG 0.13–0.14 (48%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.9 xGLAK 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 38/100 · #776 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 63% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).