Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 5, 2016·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Montréal Canadiens 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

PHI winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL1419111324
PHI11221019431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:06PHIBrayden SchennAssists: Sean Couturier · Snap, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:14MTLAlex GalchenyukAssists: Mark Barberio, Daniel Carr · Deflected, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:20PHIShayne GostisbehereAssists: R.J. Umberger, Scott Laughton · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:12PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Brayden Schenn · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:03MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Alexei Emelin, Max Pacioretty · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:41PHISean CouturierGWGAssists: Nick Schultz, Brayden Schenn · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:03MTLDaniel CarrAssists: David Desharnais, Lars Eller · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 6:49PHINick Schultz: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 19:39MTLJeff Petry: Holding2 min
  3. P2 6:26MTLP.K. Subban: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:29PHIRyan White: Interference2 min
  5. P2 19:03PHIRyan White: Boarding2 min
  6. P3 2:29MTLAlexei Emelin: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 16:41PHISean Couturier: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win54% to win
← MTL attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Plekanec won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLPHI
24Shots on goal31
2.7Expected goals2.7
65Shot attempts47
40Faceoffs won36
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
25Hits41
7Blocked shots25
6Giveaways7
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestFleischmann – Desharnais – Byron5:06

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Mitchell – Byron – Flynn3:50

    xG 0.13–0.00 (99%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Plekanec – Pacioretty – Gallagher12:15

    xG 0.28–0.52 (35%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  4. Fleischmann – Desharnais – Smith-Pelly5:51

    xG 0.03–0.31 (9%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEmelin – Barberio12:36

    xG 0.53–0.28 (65%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Subban – Beaulieu14:11

    xG 0.25–0.71 (26%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

  3. Markov – Petry10:44

    xG 0.15–0.82 (16%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSchenn – Couturier – Raffl11:58

    xG 0.96–0.29 (77%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

  2. Giroux – Voracek – Simmonds10:15

    xG 0.63–0.10 (87%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  3. VandeVelde – White – Bellemare10:48

    xG 0.30–0.27 (53%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  4. Umberger – Read – Laughton7:15

    xG 0.04–0.21 (17%)attempts 2–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Gudas13:54

    xG 0.73–0.11 (87%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Streit – Schultz13:18

    xG 0.87–0.28 (76%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Gostisbehere10:45

    xG 0.47–0.42 (53%)attempts 8–11goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.7 xGMTL 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #522 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

PHI winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).