Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 6, 2016·Honda Center, Anaheim

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Anaheim Ducks 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 79% of the time.

ANA winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR18216114438
ANA01801407039

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:54TORPA ParenteauGWGAssists: Matt Hunwick, Tyler Bozak · Slap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:38TORPA ParenteauAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Tyler Bozak · Backhand, 0.24 xG2–0
  3. P2 12:35TORNazem KadriAssists: Leo Komarov, Roman Polak · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P3 2:47TORBrad BoyesAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Shawn Matthias · Tip-in, 0.14 xG4–0
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 5:17TORShawn Matthias: Interference2 min
  2. P1 9:24ANAKevin Bieksa: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 13:25ANARyan Getzlaf: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 13:25TORJames van Riemsdyk: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 14:23ANAShawn Horcoff: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 17:56TORRoman Polak: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 17:56ANAJosh Manson: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 17:56TORRoman Polak: Boarding2 min
  9. P1 17:56ANAJosh Manson: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 3:48ANARyan Kesler: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 17:47ANANate Thompson: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 3:50ANACorey Perry: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 3:50ANAPatrick Maroon: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  14. P3 3:50ANACorey Perry: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 3:50TORJonathan Bernier: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win54% to win
← TOR attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORANA
38Shots on goal39
4.7Expected goals2.7
78Shot attempts63
30Faceoffs won34
6Power plays2
13Penalty minutes31
22Hits14
10Blocked shots23
14Giveaways15
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKomarov – Grabner – Kadri9:40

    xG 0.74–0.32 (70%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  2. Lupul – Winnik – Holland9:26

    xG 0.37–0.09 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – Matthias – Arcobello6:46

    xG 0.21–0.24 (46%)attempts 10–6goals 1–0

  4. Parenteau – van Riemsdyk – Bozak13:01

    xG 1.00–1.27 (44%)attempts 15–21goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Marincin12:26

    xG 0.63–0.42 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Phaneuf – Gardiner12:38

    xG 0.66–0.47 (58%)attempts 19–11goals 2–0

  3. Hunwick – Rielly14:37

    xG 1.18–1.11 (52%)attempts 18–26goals 1–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Rakell6:41

    xG 0.51–0.18 (74%)attempts 13–5goals 0–1

  2. Horcoff – Cogliano – Silfverberg6:53

    xG 0.37–0.07 (84%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Thompson – Santorelli – Hagelin3:02

    xG 0.13–0.04 (78%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Horcoff – Santorelli – Cogliano3:40

    xG 0.04–0.02 (63%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolzer – Lindholm11:45

    xG 0.72–0.18 (80%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Holzer – Vatanen2:35

    xG 0.05–0.02 (76%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Bieksa – Vatanen10:35

    xG 0.61–0.90 (40%)attempts 18–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.7 xGTOR 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANATOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 10/100 · #1120 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.78 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 79% of the time.

ANA winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).