Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 15, 2016·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT1811121803440
TBL172611012525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:51TBLVladislav NamestnikovAssists: Steven Stamkos, Nikita Nesterov · Snap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:37PITKris LetangAssists: Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:12TBLValtteri FilppulaPPAssists: Tyler Johnson, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:47TBLVladislav NamestnikovPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Valtteri Filppula · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:23PITPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 10:13PITTrevor DaleyAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Phil Kessel · Slap, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P3 13:48PITChris KunitzAssists: Olli Maatta, Patric Hornqvist · Slap, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:21TBLAnton StralmanAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Cedric Paquette · Backhand, 0.01 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:11TBLVladislav NamestnikovGWGAssists: Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:46TBLNikita Kucherov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:47TBLCedric Paquette: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 18:09PITBryan Rust: Holding2 min
  4. P2 4:43TBLAndrej Sustr: Holding2 min
  5. P2 7:45PITMatt Cullen: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 7:49PITEric Fehr: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 8:54PITMatt Cullen: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 13:06TBLNikita Nesterov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 2:48PITChris Kunitz: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win54% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
40Shots on goal25
2.8Expected goals2.2
73Shot attempts45
37Faceoffs won31
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
19Hits21
14Blocked shots19
9Giveaways12
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Hornqvist12:30

    xG 0.42–0.12 (77%)attempts 13–4goals 2–0

  2. Fehr – Rust – Kuhnhackl6:29

    xG 0.32–0.13 (71%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Kessel – Perron11:52

    xG 0.50–0.47 (52%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  4. Fehr – Kuhnhackl – Sheary2:05

    xG 0.02–0.10 (15%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Maatta13:32

    xG 0.45–0.15 (75%)attempts 14–7goals 2–0

  2. Daley – Letang3:10

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Lovejoy – Dumoulin11:45

    xG 0.41–0.38 (52%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestFilppula – Callahan – Paquette11:22

    xG 0.34–0.26 (57%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  2. Killorn – Johnson – Kucherov12:27

    xG 0.44–0.38 (54%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Brown – Paquette2:07

    xG 0.02–0.10 (13%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

  4. Stamkos – Palat – Namestnikov11:16

    xG 0.29–0.58 (33%)attempts 9–16goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Stralman – Hedman9:52

    xG 0.49–0.45 (52%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  2. Coburn – Nesterov7:03

    xG 0.21–0.19 (52%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  3. Garrison – Sustr13:12

    xG 0.32–0.31 (51%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.2 xGPIT 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #17 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.93 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).