Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 16, 2016·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Montréal Canadiens 3, St. Louis Blues 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 81% of the time.

STL winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MTL0172221901349
STL19171412422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:34STLRobby FabbriAssists: Jori Lehtera, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:41MTLP.K. SubbanPPAssists: Andrei Markov · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:24MTLMax PaciorettyAssists: Nathan Beaulieu, Tomas Plekanec · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:31STLPaul StastnyAssists: Colton Parayko, Patrik Berglund · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:51MTLTomas PlekanecAssists: Max Pacioretty, Brendan Gallagher · Slap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:35STLTy RattieAssists: David Backes, Patrik Berglund · Slap, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:04STLJori LehteraGWGAssists: Robby Fabbri · Tip-in, 0.19 xG3–4
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 3:58STLTy Rattie: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:26STLPatrik Berglund: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 0:59STLChris Butler: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 2:41STLPaul Stastny: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:21MTLAlexei Emelin: Holding2 min
  6. P2 13:01MTLMax Pacioretty: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 13:01MTLTomas Plekanec: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:01MTLBrendan Gallagher: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 13:01STLTroy Brouwer: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 13:01STLDavid Backes: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 13:01STLAlex Pietrangelo: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 13:01STLDavid Backes: Roughing2 min
  13. P2 15:56STLAlex Pietrangelo: Roughing2 min
  14. P2 17:41STLKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  15. P2 17:41STLKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  16. P2 17:41MTLTomas Plekanec: Roughing2 min
  17. P2 17:41STLKevin Shattenkirk: Misconduct10 min
  18. P3 11:16MTLAlexei Emelin: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win54% to win
← MTL attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLSTL
49Shots on goal22
4.6Expected goals2.4
75Shot attempts43
36Faceoffs won26
7Power plays2
12Penalty minutes32
20Hits26
10Blocked shots14
6Giveaways5
4Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPlekanec – Pacioretty – Gallagher12:05

    xG 1.38–0.19 (88%)attempts 20–6goals 2–0

  2. Desharnais – Weise – Galchenyuk8:23

    xG 0.44–0.59 (43%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  3. Mitchell – Flynn – de la Rose8:54

    xG 0.02–0.18 (12%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Fleischmann – Byron – Eller8:55

    xG 0.28–0.62 (31%)attempts 9–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestMarkov – Subban12:23

    xG 1.01–0.38 (73%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  2. Barberio – Beaulieu10:30

    xG 0.67–0.36 (65%)attempts 9–5goals 1–2

  3. Emelin – Petry13:55

    xG 0.43–0.58 (43%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Tarasenko – Fabbri9:16

    xG 0.44–0.37 (54%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  2. Backes – Berglund – Rattie8:54

    xG 0.20–0.27 (42%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  3. Steen – Brouwer – Stastny10:12

    xG 0.46–0.71 (39%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  4. Upshall – Brodziak – Reaves5:16

    xG 0.03–0.48 (6%)attempts 1–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Parayko10:04

    xG 0.81–0.44 (65%)attempts 11–6goals 2–0

  2. Edmundson – Parayko2:29

    xG 0.08–0.05 (60%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Bortuzzo – Pietrangelo2:13

    xG 0.03–0.02 (65%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.4 xGMTL 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #55 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.82 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 81% of the time.

STL winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).