Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 17, 2016·United Center, Chicago

Montréal Canadiens 2, Chicago Blackhawks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 66% of the time.

CHI winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL16010113229
CHI11021429533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:40CHIRichard PanikAssists: Erik Gustafsson · Slap, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:16MTLLars EllerAssists: Jeff Petry, Alexei Emelin · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:38CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Marian Hossa, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:39CHIJonathan ToewsGWGAssists: Andrew Shaw, Marian Hossa · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P3 10:22MTLMax PaciorettyPPAssists: Brendan Gallagher, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.48 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:33CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Artemi Panarin, Artem Anisimov · Snap, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:36CHIMarian HossaENAssists: Duncan Keith, Andrew Shaw · Deflected, 0.59 xG2–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 1:13MTLTorrey Mitchell: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 9:55MTLTorrey Mitchell: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 11:20CHIJonathan Toews: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:32MTLTomas Plekanec: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 5:55MTLP.K. Subban: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 9:07CHITrevor van Riemsdyk: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win54% to win
← MTL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Anisimov won the faceoff against Mitchell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLCHI
29Shots on goal33
4.3Expected goals3.3
63Shot attempts52
25Faceoffs won31
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
31Hits11
11Blocked shots20
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestFleischmann – Byron – Eller4:49

    xG 0.51–0.02 (97%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Fleischmann – Eller – Weise6:00

    xG 0.62–0.16 (80%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Plekanec – Pacioretty – Gallagher12:04

    xG 0.67–0.32 (68%)attempts 19–7goals 0–1

  4. Desharnais – Byron – Galchenyuk7:13

    xG 0.24–0.13 (65%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEmelin – Petry19:16

    xG 1.27–0.63 (67%)attempts 23–13goals 1–2

  2. Markov – Subban12:26

    xG 0.75–0.39 (65%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

  3. Subban – Beaulieu5:16

    xG 0.02–0.05 (32%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestPanik – Garbutt – Rasmussen7:49

    xG 0.34–0.18 (66%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

  2. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin11:24

    xG 0.66–0.86 (44%)attempts 14–10goals 1–1

  3. Hossa – Toews – Shaw12:17

    xG 0.44–0.71 (39%)attempts 11–16goals 1–0

  4. Desjardins – Danault – Teravainen10:00

    xG 0.02–0.45 (5%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Gustafsson10:08

    xG 0.36–0.21 (63%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Seabrook – van Riemsdyk4:32

    xG 0.21–0.18 (53%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

  3. Rozsival – van Riemsdyk9:53

    xG 0.49–0.48 (50%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.3 xGMTL 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #550 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 66% of the time.

CHI winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).