Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 23, 2016·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Tampa Bay Lightning 2, Florida Panthers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 71% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL01305222240
FLA01141915535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 8:50FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:36FLANick BjugstadPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:56FLAReilly SmithGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 17:33FLAVincent TrocheckAssists: Logan Shaw, Jussi Jokinen · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–4
  5. P3 5:39TBLVictor HedmanPPAssists: Tyler Johnson, Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P3 15:52FLABrian CampbellENAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Jaromir Jagr · Slap, 0.71 xG1–5
  7. P3 18:31TBLJT BrownAssists: Brian Boyle · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:35FLADmitry Kulikov: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 4:19TBLOndrej Palat: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 6:45FLAJussi Jokinen: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 12:54FLAQuinton Howden: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 14:34TBLValtteri Filppula: Holding2 min
  6. P2 10:37TBLTyler Johnson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 13:32TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 3:40FLASteven Kampfer: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:20FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win54% to win
← TBL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLFLA
40Shots on goal35
2.1Expected goals3.3
57Shot attempts48
32Faceoffs won35
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
20Hits24
7Blocked shots9
5Giveaways4
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Brown – Paquette5:37

    xG 0.57–0.22 (72%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Stamkos – Palat – Namestnikov8:18

    xG 0.35–0.18 (66%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Kucherov – Paquette2:40

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Johnson – Kucherov7:11

    xG 0.09–0.27 (25%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Nesterov2:41

    xG 0.22–0.06 (78%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Carle3:19

    xG 0.42–0.28 (60%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  3. Carle – Stralman2:28

    xG 0.05–0.02 (73%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Howden – Shaw6:32

    xG 0.48–0.19 (72%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Jagr – Huberdeau – Barkov7:28

    xG 0.23–0.12 (67%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  3. Jokinen – Smith – Trocheck5:15

    xG 0.12–0.02 (83%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – MacKenzie – Knight7:07

    xG 0.03–0.58 (6%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Gudbranson9:22

    xG 0.50–0.09 (84%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Kampfer – Petrovic8:43

    xG 0.37–0.18 (67%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Kulikov – Ekblad9:51

    xG 0.58–0.55 (51%)attempts 10–11goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.3 xGTBL 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #932 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.86 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 71% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).