Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 26, 2016·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Toronto Maple Leafs 1, Florida Panthers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 69% of the time.

FLA winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR1501008123
FLA0731525527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:35TORNazem KadriAssists: Peter Holland, Jake Gardiner · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:49FLAAleksander BarkovPPAssists: Brian Campbell, Roberto Luongo · Backhand, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:40FLAVincent TrocheckPPGWGAssists: Jussi Jokinen, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:13FLAJussi JokinenAssists: Reilly Smith · Snap, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:52FLAReilly SmithAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Vincent Trocheck · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–4
  6. P3 7:43FLAAlexander PetrovicUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG1–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 9:38TORNick Spaling: Interference2 min
  2. P1 19:15TORPeter Holland: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:15FLAAaron Ekblad: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 2:46TORDion Phaneuf: Fighting5 min · PPG
  5. P2 2:46FLADmitry Kulikov: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 2:46TORDion Phaneuf: Boarding2 min
  7. P2 6:20TORShawn Matthias: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 10:03TORMorgan Rielly: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 14:54FLAJussi Jokinen: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 18:02TORByron Froese: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 13:16FLAShawn Thornton: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 19:49TORRich Clune: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 19:49FLAShawn Thornton: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win54% to win
← TOR attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Trocheck won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORFLA
23Shots on goal27
1.7Expected goals2.7
45Shot attempts45
31Faceoffs won29
2Power plays5
22Penalty minutes16
36Hits22
5Blocked shots12
3Giveaways4
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKomarov – Kadri – Holland3:55

    xG 0.22–0.02 (93%)attempts 5–1goals 1–1

  2. Komarov – Grabner – Kadri5:37

    xG 0.19–0.19 (49%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Winnik – Clune – Froese7:55

    xG 0.04–0.13 (23%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Lupul – Spaling – Holland7:07

    xG 0.11–0.32 (25%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunwick – Rielly12:38

    xG 0.56–0.32 (64%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  2. Phaneuf – Gardiner12:20

    xG 0.25–0.44 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  3. Polak – Marincin13:39

    xG 0.30–0.58 (34%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Smith – Trocheck8:32

    xG 0.86–0.08 (92%)attempts 13–3goals 2–0

  2. Bjugstad – Howden – Shaw9:29

    xG 0.41–0.19 (68%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – MacKenzie – Knight10:55

    xG 0.00–0.43 (0%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

  4. Jagr – Huberdeau – Barkov10:20

    xG 0.20–0.63 (24%)attempts 7–15goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKampfer – Petrovic10:09

    xG 0.38–0.14 (73%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Campbell – Gudbranson11:57

    xG 0.67–0.50 (57%)attempts 9–10goals 1–1

  3. Kulikov – Ekblad9:05

    xG 0.29–0.13 (69%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.7 xGTOR 1.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #847 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 69% of the time.

FLA winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).