Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 2, 2016·Barclays Center, Brooklyn

Minnesota Wild 3, New York Islanders 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

NYI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN12018115343
NYI012315211538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:34MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Mathew Dumba, Nino Niederreiter · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:20NYIMikhail GrabovskiAssists: John Tavares, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:07NYIAnders LeeAssists: Travis Hamonic, Josh Bailey · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:36MINJason PominvilleAssists: Jason Zucker, Jarret Stoll · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:18NYIBrock NelsonAssists: Calvin de Haan · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 2:49NYIFrans NielsenPPGWGAssists: Nick Leddy, Kyle Okposo · Slap, 0.25 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:52NYIJohn TavaresAssists: Mikhail Grabovski · Snap, 0.03 xG2–5
  8. P3 10:04MINNino NiederreiterPPAssists: Mathew Dumba, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.34 xG3–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 6:21NYIJohn Tavares: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 16:15NYIMarek Zidlicky: Interference2 min
  3. P3 1:21MINZach Parise: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 8:29NYIScott Mayfield: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 14:46NYIAnders Lee: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYI
47% to win54% to win
← MIN attackNYI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Tavares
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINNYI
43Shots on goal38
3.8Expected goals3.1
64Shot attempts69
38Faceoffs won33
4Power plays1
2Penalty minutes8
19Hits18
14Blocked shots11
5Giveaways4
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPorter – Carter – Haula6:32

    xG 0.14–0.07 (65%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Coyle – Niederreiter10:09

    xG 0.57–0.65 (47%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

  3. Koivu – Parise – Coyle2:18

    xG 0.02–0.10 (14%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Vanek – Zucker7:17

    xG 0.29–0.46 (38%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Prosser5:48

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon14:41

    xG 0.85–0.59 (59%)attempts 14–14goals 2–0

  3. Prosser – Dumba2:15

    xG 0.16–0.02 (88%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. bestGrabovski – Tavares – Strome14:11

    xG 1.20–0.50 (71%)attempts 26–13goals 2–0

  2. Bailey – Lee – Nelson9:41

    xG 0.53–0.24 (69%)attempts 18–4goals 2–0

  3. Clutterbuck – Martin – Cizikas6:49

    xG 0.14–0.27 (34%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Nielsen – Okposo – Kulemin10:10

    xG 0.26–0.58 (31%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamonic – de Haan18:40

    xG 1.57–0.62 (72%)attempts 32–11goals 3–0

  2. Zidlicky – Hickey11:40

    xG 0.39–0.57 (40%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

  3. Leddy – Mayfield13:22

    xG 0.40–0.80 (34%)attempts 15–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYI 3.1 xGMIN 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #310 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50NYI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

NYI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (NYI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).