Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 4, 2016·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Nashville Predators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 68% of the time.

NSH winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI252826619
NSH010211119340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:51PHIMatt ReadAssists: Scott Laughton, Nick Schultz · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:49PHIBrayden SchennAssists: Sean Couturier, Sam Gagner · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:23NSHRyan JohansenAssists: Roman Josi, Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:10PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Scott Laughton · Wrist, 0.29 xG3–1
  5. P2 16:15PHIClaude GirouxGWGAssists: Jakub Voracek · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–1
  6. P2 16:40NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: James Neal, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–2
  7. P3 10:03NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Roman Josi, Mike Ribeiro · Slap, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:01PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Claude Giroux · Tip-in, 0.25 xG5–3
  9. P3 13:11PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Jakub Voracek, Wayne Simmonds · Slap, 0.09 xG6–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:01PHIRadko Gudas: High sticking double minor4 min
  2. P1 17:39PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:16NSHCraig Smith: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 5:46PHISam Gagner: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 10:49PHIEvgeny Medvedev: Holding2 min
  6. P3 5:30PHIWayne Simmonds: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 9:51PHIRadko Gudas: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 11:27NSHPaul Gaustad: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win54% to win
← PHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHINSH
19Shots on goal40
1.9Expected goals2.9
30Shot attempts60
23Faceoffs won34
3Power plays7
14Penalty minutes6
15Hits14
14Blocked shots6
10Giveaways2
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGagner – Schenn – Couturier5:53

    xG 0.18–0.02 (88%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Read – Laughton – Raffl5:04

    xG 0.25–0.14 (63%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Giroux – Voracek – Simmonds10:57

    xG 0.30–0.33 (48%)attempts 8–13goals 2–0

  4. VandeVelde – White – Giroux2:09

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Streit – Schultz12:03

    xG 0.45–0.42 (51%)attempts 8–11goals 3–1

  2. Del Zotto – Gostisbehere13:12

    xG 0.19–0.50 (27%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – Medvedev13:32

    xG 0.01–0.73 (2%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestFisher – Smith – Salomaki7:16

    xG 0.52–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  2. Neal – Jarnkrok – Johansen7:55

    xG 0.47–0.26 (65%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Ribeiro – Forsberg – Arvidsson4:53

    xG 0.17–0.10 (64%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

  4. Fisher – Neal – Johansen3:12

    xG 0.02–0.13 (13%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm7:47

    xG 0.43–0.03 (93%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  2. Ekholm – Bitetto8:57

    xG 0.28–0.06 (82%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Josi13:14

    xG 0.81–0.88 (48%)attempts 16–13goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.9 xGPHI 1.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #207 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.45 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 68% of the time.

NSH winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).