Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 6, 2016·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Minnesota Wild 1, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN0712408139
STL093817424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:47STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Paul Stastny, Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:19STLJori LehteraPPGWGAssists: Robby Fabbri, Troy Brouwer · Wrist, 0.39 xG0–2
  3. P2 16:51STLPaul StastnyUnassisted · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–3
  4. P2 18:14MINMathew DumbaPPAssists: Zach Parise, Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.43 xG1–3
  5. P3 2:38STLTroy BrouwerPPAssists: Robby Fabbri, Jori Lehtera · Snap, 0.18 xG1–4
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 2:08STLKevin Shattenkirk: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 6:44MINNino Niederreiter: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 19:20STLScottie Upshall: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 2:15MINMikko Koivu: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:11MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 13:46MINJarret Stoll: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 13:46STLKyle Brodziak: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:46STLJoel Edmundson: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 17:31STLRobby Fabbri: High sticking2 min · PPG
  10. P2 18:14STLScottie Upshall: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 0:54MINRyan Suter: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 4:41MINZach Parise: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 12:40STLDavid Backes: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 16:52STLJoel Edmundson: Interference2 min
  15. P3 17:47MINMikko Koivu: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win54% to win
← MIN attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Steen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSTL
39Shots on goal24
4.4Expected goals2.8
63Shot attempts37
40Faceoffs won28
7Power plays6
14Penalty minutes16
19Hits20
5Blocked shots10
3Giveaways6
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Granlund – Niederreiter8:59

    xG 1.04–0.41 (72%)attempts 14–5goals 0–1

  2. Carter – Fontaine – Graovac8:45

    xG 0.18–0.23 (44%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Stoll – Porter – Haula7:02

    xG 0.02–0.17 (9%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Koivu – Parise – Coyle11:38

    xG 0.18–0.40 (31%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba6:57

    xG 0.59–0.33 (64%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Prosser3:39

    xG 0.25–0.08 (75%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Dumba5:52

    xG 0.09–0.03 (71%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBrouwer – Lehtera – Fabbri6:52

    xG 0.38–0.17 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Upshall – Steen – Backes9:37

    xG 0.15–0.20 (43%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Stastny – Berglund – Tarasenko9:29

    xG 0.58–0.69 (45%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  4. Brodziak – Paajarvi – Jaskin6:49

    xG 0.10–0.29 (26%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Edmundson10:23

    xG 0.40–0.30 (57%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo11:21

    xG 0.31–0.26 (55%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Gunnarsson – Parayko10:28

    xG 0.36–0.73 (33%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.8 xGMIN 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #940 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.81 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).