Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 9, 2016·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Washington Capitals 5, Nashville Predators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 70% of the time.

NSH winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH1616311523
NSH0141725326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:02WSHJason ChimeraAssists: Tom Wilson · Tip-in, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:55WSHTom WilsonAssists: Marcus Johansson, John Carlson · Slap, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 14:42NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Craig Smith, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:00WSHJustin WilliamsAssists: Evgeny Kuznetsov, Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–1
  5. P3 8:03WSHMarcus JohanssonGWGAssists: Justin Williams, Karl Alzner · Wrist, 0.28 xG4–1
  6. P3 9:49NSHRoman JosiAssists: Calle Jarnkrok, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–2
  7. P3 12:00NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Ryan Ellis · Tip-in, 0.11 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:00WSHAlex OvechkinENAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Marcus Johansson · Wrist, 0.76 xG5–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:41WSHNate Schmidt: Holding2 min
  2. P1 4:42NSHMike Fisher: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 7:23WSHJustin Williams: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 14:06NSHCraig Smith: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 14:13WSHMarcus Johansson: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 10:54WSHAndre Burakovsky: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 12:50WSHMarcus Johansson: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  8. P3 18:37NSHMattias Ekholm: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 19:41WSHMatt Niskanen: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win54% to win
← WSH attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Backstrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHNSH
23Shots on goal26
2.8Expected goals1.8
44Shot attempts53
35Faceoffs won29
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
18Hits18
18Blocked shots10
9Giveaways5
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOvechkin – Oshie – Backstrom13:53

    xG 0.52–0.12 (81%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0

  2. Chimera – Johansson – Wilson10:00

    xG 0.36–0.15 (71%)attempts 5–7goals 2–0

  3. Williams – Kuznetsov – Burakovsky10:53

    xG 0.51–0.31 (62%)attempts 7–11goals 1–2

  4. Laich – Richards – Latta5:48

    xG 0.06–0.35 (14%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Alzner17:23

    xG 1.19–0.28 (81%)attempts 22–7goals 2–1

  2. Chorney – Orlov9:12

    xG 0.43–0.48 (47%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  3. Carlson – Schmidt16:53

    xG 0.19–0.49 (28%)attempts 5–16goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Bass – Salomaki5:08

    xG 0.43–0.04 (92%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Ribeiro – Forsberg – Arvidsson8:47

    xG 0.21–0.35 (38%)attempts 11–4goals 1–2

  3. Fisher – Wilson – Smith11:08

    xG 0.24–0.44 (35%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

  4. Neal – Jarnkrok – Johansen13:33

    xG 0.15–0.92 (14%)attempts 6–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm16:13

    xG 0.83–0.55 (60%)attempts 16–8goals 1–1

  2. Jackman – Bitetto8:25

    xG 0.12–0.16 (43%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  3. Weber – Josi19:55

    xG 0.34–1.15 (23%)attempts 11–21goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 1.8 xGWSH 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #274 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.31 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 70% of the time.

NSH winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).