Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 11, 2016·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 1, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 85% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF014010118142
PHI0641418528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:23PHIR.J. UmbergerAssists: Sam Gagner, Mark Streit · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:11PHIBrayden SchennGWGAssists: Michael Raffl · Snap, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:33PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Jakub Voracek · Snap, 0.02 xG0–3
  4. P2 15:57PHIMichael RafflAssists: Nick Cousins · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P3 10:04BUFJamie McGinnAssists: Jake McCabe, Mark Pysyk · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P3 10:33PHINick CousinsUnassisted · Slap, 0.08 xG1–5
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 4:46BUFZach Bogosian: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 14:06PHIMark Streit: Interference2 min
  3. P1 16:14PHIMark Streit: Interference2 min
  4. P1 19:08PHIJakub Voracek: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 4:14BUFRobin Lehner: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 10:52PHIBrandon Manning: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 13:04PHIRadko Gudas: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 15:57BUFMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 15:57PHIRadko Gudas: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 15:57BUFMarcus Foligno: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 16:27PHIRadko Gudas: Charging5 min
  12. P3 16:27BUFJake McCabe: Instigator2 min
  13. P3 16:27PHIRadko Gudas: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 16:27BUFJake McCabe: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 16:27BUFJake McCabe: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
42Shots on goal28
4.3Expected goals1.9
90Shot attempts42
23Faceoffs won24
6Power plays3
28Penalty minutes25
24Hits35
13Blocked shots32
8Giveaways6
8Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Bailey – Reinhart5:41

    xG 1.11–0.10 (92%)attempts 14–3goals 0–1

  2. McGinn – O'Reilly – Catenacci3:50

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  3. McGinn – O'Reilly – Deslauriers2:51

    xG 0.02–0.02 (48%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Gionta – Foligno – Eichel3:18

    xG 0.11–0.13 (47%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Ristolainen12:15

    xG 1.70–0.31 (85%)attempts 25–10goals 0–2

  2. Pysyk – McCabe3:57

    xG 0.47–0.01 (97%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  3. Franson – Bogosian6:58

    xG 0.63–0.25 (71%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSchenn – Cousins – Raffl9:35

    xG 0.68–0.34 (67%)attempts 10–13goals 3–0

  2. VandeVelde – White – Bellemare8:25

    xG 0.20–0.44 (31%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  3. Umberger – Gagner – Weal8:45

    xG 0.36–1.08 (25%)attempts 8–15goals 1–0

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Simmonds7:49

    xG 0.05–1.45 (3%)attempts 5–17goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Manning – Gudas9:46

    xG 0.55–0.73 (43%)attempts 14–13goals 2–0

  2. Streit – Manning2:16

    xG 0.18–0.42 (30%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  3. Streit – Schultz8:30

    xG 0.23–0.59 (28%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 1.9 xGBUF 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #1046 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 85% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).