Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 11, 2016·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Anaheim Ducks 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 71% of the time.

CBJ winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA1917110010327
CBJ08111210052434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:47ANADavid PerronAssists: Chris Stewart, Ryan Getzlaf · Snap, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P2 19:48ANAMike SantorelliAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, David Perron · Snap, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 19:55CBJWilliam KarlssonAssists: Nick Foligno · Snap, 0.22 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:45ANARyan GarbuttAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Josh Manson · Snap, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:03CBJBrandon SaadAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Cody Goloubef · Snap, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:57CBJBrandon DubinskyPPAssists: Nick Foligno, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.28 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. CBJ Cam Atkinson scored
  2. 2. ANA Jakob Silfverberg stopped
  3. 3. CBJ Alexander Wennberg scored
  4. 4. ANA Corey Perry stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:43ANADavid Perron: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 6:00ANARyan Kesler: Elbowing2 min
  3. P1 13:03CBJDalton Prout: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 9:36CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 0:00ANAChris Stewart: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 0:00CBJDalton Prout: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 13:22ANAJosh Manson: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. OT 3:42ANARickard Rakell: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACBJ
27Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals3.8
48Shot attempts66
30Faceoffs won19
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
20Hits29
24Blocked shots12
2Giveaways1
10Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Stewart – Perron6:28

    xG 0.63–0.24 (72%)attempts 7–4goals 1–1

  2. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg12:27

    xG 0.45–0.19 (71%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Thompson – Perron – Garbutt2:58

    xG 0.04–0.02 (71%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  4. Thompson – Santorelli – Garbutt4:31

    xG 0.10–0.51 (16%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBieksa – Fowler14:25

    xG 0.48–0.10 (83%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  2. Manson – Lindholm14:07

    xG 0.78–1.10 (41%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  3. Despres – Vatanen14:14

    xG 0.26–0.85 (23%)attempts 11–19goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Saad – Wennberg9:53

    xG 1.05–0.51 (67%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  2. Foligno – Calvert – Karlsson9:31

    xG 0.23–0.17 (57%)attempts 4–5goals 1–1

  3. Campbell – Bourque – Rychel5:01

    xG 0.04–0.01 (81%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Dubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner12:01

    xG 0.31–0.83 (27%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Jones16:28

    xG 1.38–0.41 (77%)attempts 21–8goals 0–1

  2. Johnson – Goloubef11:57

    xG 0.97–0.43 (69%)attempts 12–10goals 1–1

  3. Tyutin – Prout13:35

    xG 0.51–0.74 (41%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.8 xGANA 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #172 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.16 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 71% of the time.

CBJ winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).