Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 11, 2016·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Washington Capitals 4, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH01031518433
MIN08115213336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:14WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: T.J. Oshie, Nicklas Backstrom · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:21WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: John Carlson, Nicklas Backstrom · Wrist, 0.52 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:27MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Mikko Koivu, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.28 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:55WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Nicklas Backstrom · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:35MINRyan SuterPPAssists: Mathew Dumba, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:08WSHJason ChimeraENGWGAssists: Tom Wilson · Wrist, 0.76 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:56MINMikael GranlundAssists: Zach Parise, Thomas Vanek · Wrist, 0.32 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:53WSHJustin Williams: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 11:24MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 12:05WSHT.J. Oshie: Interference2 min
  4. P1 13:57WSHMatt Niskanen: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 19:54MINChristian Folin: Holding2 min
  6. P2 4:10MINThomas Vanek: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 7:48WSHDmitry Orlov: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 16:23MINCharlie Coyle: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 5:59WSHJustin Williams: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 9:30MINJarret Stoll: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win54% to win
← WSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHMIN
33Shots on goal36
3.5Expected goals3.3
56Shot attempts72
22Faceoffs won46
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
21Hits14
17Blocked shots12
3Giveaways4
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestChimera – Johansson – Wilson9:18

    xG 0.36–0.11 (76%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Laich – Richards – Latta4:18

    xG 0.21–0.08 (73%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Williams – Kuznetsov – Burakovsky9:26

    xG 0.17–0.37 (32%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Oshie – Backstrom11:04

    xG 0.56–0.79 (41%)attempts 14–17goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestChorney – Orlov9:59

    xG 0.64–0.19 (77%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  2. Niskanen – Alzner12:22

    xG 0.58–0.65 (47%)attempts 12–18goals 1–1

  3. Carlson – Schmidt11:54

    xG 0.17–0.33 (35%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Parise – Coyle12:10

    xG 0.63–0.35 (64%)attempts 18–12goals 1–1

  2. Vanek – Haula – Fontaine7:03

    xG 0.35–0.14 (72%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Stoll – Carter – Zucker5:59

    xG 0.08–0.32 (20%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Granlund – Niederreiter9:24

    xG 0.18–0.51 (26%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba9:12

    xG 0.52–0.23 (69%)attempts 18–6goals 1–0

  2. Prosser – Reilly3:23

    xG 0.28–0.01 (97%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Folin4:54

    xG 0.27–0.04 (87%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.3 xGWSH 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #498 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.60 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).