Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 17, 2016·Madison Square Garden, New York

Chicago Blackhawks 5, New York Rangers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 54% of the time.

NYR winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI161737520
NYR01019215334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:30CHIAndrew DesjardinsAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:05CHIArtemi PanarinPPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Michal Rozsival · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:45NYRKevin HayesAssists: Oscar Lindberg · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:24NYRDerick BrassardPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Chris Kreider · Snap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:17NYRDan BoylePPAssists: Kevin Hayes, J.T. Miller · Slap, 0.37 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:53CHIAndrew ShawPPAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.29 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:00CHIArtemi PanarinPPGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Snap, 0.28 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:49CHIArtemi PanarinENAssists: Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.74 xG5–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 18:01NYRJesper Fast: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 8:17NYRChris Kreider: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 19:34CHIVinnie Hinostroza: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P3 8:11NYRViktor Stalberg: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 16:30NYRKeith Yandle: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
47% to win54% to win
← CHI attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stepan won the faceoff against Anisimov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINYR
20Shots on goal34
3.4Expected goals3.2
38Shot attempts63
26Faceoffs won31
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
11Hits28
16Blocked shots10
9Giveaways15
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDesjardins – Danault – Teravainen11:46

    xG 0.55–0.16 (78%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Toews – Panik – Shaw11:25

    xG 0.76–0.49 (61%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  3. Mashinter – Hinostroza – Rasmussen5:39

    xG 0.22–0.06 (79%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin10:45

    xG 0.12–0.66 (16%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Hjalmarsson16:16

    xG 0.88–0.50 (64%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  2. Rozsival – Keith2:44

    xG 0.13–0.03 (81%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Rozsival – Gustafsson10:04

    xG 0.32–0.37 (46%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestStepan – Kreider – Zuccarello11:58

    xG 0.95–0.41 (70%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Brassard – Fast – Miller13:46

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  3. Stalberg – Lindberg – Hayes8:48

    xG 0.22–0.31 (41%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  4. Moore – Paille – Glass5:39

    xG 0.15–0.31 (32%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirardi – McDonagh15:01

    xG 1.18–0.35 (77%)attempts 22–7goals 1–0

  2. Klein – McDonagh3:07

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Yandle6:52

    xG 0.15–0.48 (24%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.2 xGCHI 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #49 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.50 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 54% of the time.

NYR winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).