Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 19, 2016·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 54% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF21201429435
CBJ01409015038

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:55BUFJamie McGinnPPGWGAssists: Jack Eichel, Rasmus Ristolainen · Snap, 0.50 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:38BUFDavid LegwandSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P3 7:16BUFJamie McGinnAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Jack Eichel · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P3 9:53BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Evander Kane · Snap, 0.42 xG4–0
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 5:07BUFZemgus Girgensons: Illegal check to head2 min
  2. P1 8:29CBJSeth Jones: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 14:49CBJDalton Prout: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 18:03BUFMark Pysyk: Interference2 min
  5. P2 6:34CBJJack Johnson: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 14:24BUFZemgus Girgensons: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 16:55CBJScott Hartnell: Boarding5 min
  8. P2 17:26BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  9. P2 18:08BUFMarcus Foligno: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 0:00BUFEvander Kane: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 11:30CBJBoone Jenner: Hooking5 min
  12. P3 11:30CBJBoone Jenner: Game misconduct10 min
  13. P3 11:30CBJJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 11:30BUFRobin Lehner: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 11:30BUFRobin Lehner: Goalie leave crease2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
35Shots on goal38
4.0Expected goals4.3
51Shot attempts65
26Faceoffs won29
5Power plays6
16Penalty minutes28
10Hits17
15Blocked shots9
1Giveaways4
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGionta – Foligno – Larsson6:47

    xG 0.54–0.17 (76%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. O'Reilly – Kane – Reinhart8:02

    xG 0.91–0.72 (56%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  3. McGinn – Girgensons – Eichel6:06

    xG 0.25–0.23 (52%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  4. Legwand – Moulson – Deslauriers5:15

    xG 0.12–0.29 (29%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Pysyk2:15

    xG 0.83–0.18 (82%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Gorges – Ristolainen11:22

    xG 0.60–0.36 (62%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  3. Franson – Pysyk8:41

    xG 0.22–0.24 (47%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner8:47

    xG 1.28–0.15 (90%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0

  2. Campbell – Bourque – Rychel4:10

    xG 0.23–0.09 (71%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Calvert – Karlsson5:09

    xG 0.15–0.07 (69%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Campbell – Calvert – Rychel2:32

    xG 0.05–0.02 (71%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Savard12:09

    xG 0.64–0.27 (70%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Murray – Jones10:59

    xG 1.59–1.34 (54%)attempts 21–13goals 0–1

  3. Tyutin – Prout11:13

    xG 0.39–0.22 (64%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 4.3 xGBUF 4.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 10/100 · #1113 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 54% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).