Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 20, 2016·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Boston Bruins 7, Dallas Stars 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 81% of the time.

DAL winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS113316313742
DAL3120809329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:59DALAles HemskyAssists: Jason Demers, Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:24BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Brett Connolly, Patrice Bergeron · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:44DALAntoine RousselAssists: Johnny Oduya, Cody Eakin · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:28DALPatrick SharpAssists: Antoine Roussel, Jason Demers · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:24BOSBrad MarchandPPAssists: Joe Morrow, Zdeno Chara · Snap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:59BOSKevan MillerAssists: Dennis Seidenberg · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P2 19:08BOSLoui ErikssonGWGAssists: David Krejci, Dennis Seidenberg · Backhand, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 4:50BOSDavid KrejciPPAssists: Torey Krug, Matt Beleskey · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:16BOSBrett ConnollyENAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand · Wrist, 0.71 xG6–3
  10. P3 19:37BOSMatt BeleskeyPPAssists: Joe Morrow, Zdeno Chara · Backhand, 0.15 xG7–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:28BOSZac Rinaldo: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 9:37DALJohn Klingberg: Interference2 min
  3. P1 18:25DALVernon Fiddler: Delaying game2 min
  4. P2 3:12BOSAdam McQuaid: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 3:12DALAntoine Roussel: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 11:25DALVernon Fiddler: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 4:19DALJamie Benn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 6:06DALPatrick Eaves: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 18:26DALJason Demers: Roughing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win54% to win
← BOS attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSDAL
42Shots on goal29
4.7Expected goals2.5
75Shot attempts57
39Faceoffs won49
6Power plays1
7Penalty minutes17
11Hits20
9Blocked shots16
8Giveaways13
1Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson – Krejci – Pastrnak12:19

    xG 0.61–0.40 (61%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  2. Beleskey – Hayes – Kemppainen11:41

    xG 0.64–0.65 (50%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

  3. Bergeron – Marchand – Connolly10:13

    xG 0.61–0.68 (47%)attempts 10–12goals 1–2

  4. Talbot – Rinaldo – Ferraro6:49

    xG 0.00–0.28 (0%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeidenberg – Morrow8:31

    xG 0.43–0.22 (66%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  2. Seidenberg – McQuaid3:11

    xG 0.17–0.12 (58%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Chara – Miller13:51

    xG 0.60–0.58 (51%)attempts 9–18goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestFiddler – Sceviour – Nichushkin4:59

    xG 0.34–0.20 (63%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

  2. Eaves – Benn – Seguin11:00

    xG 0.73–0.60 (55%)attempts 13–13goals 0–1

  3. Spezza – Sharp – Janmark2:45

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Roussel – Eakin8:34

    xG 0.54–0.54 (50%)attempts 8–12goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Demers14:14

    xG 1.06–0.35 (75%)attempts 17–13goals 2–1

  2. Benn – Nemeth13:31

    xG 0.53–0.56 (49%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Klingberg16:56

    xG 0.44–1.01 (30%)attempts 14–19goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.5 xGBOS 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #182 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.76 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 81% of the time.

DAL winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).