Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 22, 2016·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

San Jose Sharks 6, St. Louis Blues 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 80% of the time.

STL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS31711125633
STL1711318328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:44SJSTomas HertlAssists: Joe Thornton, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:18SJSTomas HertlPPAssists: Joonas Donskoi, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Tip-in, 0.37 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:59SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Joe Thornton, Brent Burns · Tip-in, 0.52 xG3–0
  4. P1 17:36STLDavid BackesPPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.33 xG3–1
  5. P2 11:25STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Jori Lehtera · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P2 11:45SJSLogan CoutureGWGAssists: Melker Karlsson, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:26SJSJoe ThorntonUnassisted · Backhand, 0.14 xG5–2
  8. P3 9:50STLJay BouwmeesterAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Jori Lehtera · Slap, 0.04 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:35SJSJoe ThorntonENAssists: Logan Couture · Backhand, 0.41 xG6–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:37STLRyan Reaves: Boarding5 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:37STLRyan Reaves: Game misconduct10 min
  3. P1 12:01STLRobert Bortuzzo: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 16:38SJSLogan Couture: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:56STLKyle Brodziak: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 9:51SJSJoel Ward: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 17:28SJSDainius Zubrus: Holding2 min
  8. P3 2:25STLKyle Brodziak: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win54% to win
← SJS attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lehtera won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSSTL
33Shots on goal28
4.3Expected goals2.4
50Shot attempts52
32Faceoffs won28
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes21
11Hits20
13Blocked shots7
2Giveaways8
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Donskoi – Karlsson9:09

    xG 0.45–0.01 (98%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Marleau – Ward – Nieto10:09

    xG 0.31–0.47 (39%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0

  3. Zubrus – Brown – Tierney6:29

    xG 0.01–0.19 (7%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Pavelski – Hertl10:36

    xG 0.40–0.65 (38%)attempts 5–14goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – DeMelo2:19

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – DeMelo3:40

    xG 0.19–0.16 (55%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  3. Martin – DeMelo2:28

    xG 0.06–0.04 (59%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz11:06

    xG 0.40–0.04 (90%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  2. Stastny – Berglund – Paajarvi2:27

    xG 0.30–0.08 (79%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Brouwer – Stastny – Fabbri10:28

    xG 0.40–0.18 (68%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  4. Backes – Berglund – Paajarvi6:07

    xG 0.07–0.12 (36%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Bortuzzo – Edmundson10:36

    xG 0.29–0.36 (45%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  2. Gunnarsson – Parayko13:50

    xG 0.37–0.54 (41%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  3. Bouwmeester – Shattenkirk14:48

    xG 0.30–0.48 (39%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.4 xGSJS 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #217 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.19 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 80% of the time.

STL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).