Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 24, 2016·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 3, Colorado Avalanche 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS1907215020333
COL111014211052441

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:10SJSNick SpalingUnassisted · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:02COLShawn MatthiasAssists: Carl Soderberg, Francois Beauchemin · Backhand, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:50SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Tomas Hertl, Paul Martin · Wrap-around, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:35COLJarome IginlaPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Gabriel Landeskog · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:45COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Andrew Bodnarchuk, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:29SJSJoel WardAssists: Joe Thornton, Joe Pavelski · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. COL Nathan MacKinnon scored
  2. 2. SJS Joonas Donskoi stopped
  3. 3. COL Gabriel Landeskog stopped
  4. 4. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  5. 5. COL Matt Duchene scored
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 4:35COLMatt Duchene: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 15:12SJSMelker Karlsson: Holding2 min
  3. P3 5:13SJSJoonas Donskoi: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Thornton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
33Shots on goal41
3.2Expected goals2.8
62Shot attempts64
27Faceoffs won33
1Power plays2
4Penalty minutes2
17Hits22
14Blocked shots18
0Giveaways5
4Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestZubrus – Nieto – Tierney4:00

    xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Ward – Nieto6:11

    xG 0.28–0.02 (94%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Couture – Donskoi – Karlsson8:00

    xG 0.28–0.12 (71%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Ward – Couture – Donskoi3:30

    xG 0.07–0.04 (66%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Dillon15:14

    xG 0.72–0.45 (62%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  2. Martin – Burns18:24

    xG 0.75–0.48 (61%)attempts 19–23goals 2–0

  3. Vlasic – Braun17:05

    xG 0.57–0.92 (38%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestTanguay – Landeskog – MacKinnon13:28

    xG 1.06–0.51 (68%)attempts 20–12goals 1–0

  2. Iginla – Duchene – Grigorenko11:57

    xG 0.24–0.06 (81%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Comeau – Soderberg – Matthias12:11

    xG 0.42–0.46 (48%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Mitchell – McLeod – Skille8:25

    xG 0.03–0.69 (4%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Johnson19:41

    xG 0.71–0.53 (57%)attempts 19–21goals 1–1

  2. Bodnarchuk – Bigras9:39

    xG 0.55–0.62 (47%)attempts 7–8goals 1–1

  3. Holden – Barrie17:53

    xG 0.50–0.85 (37%)attempts 18–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.8 xGSJS 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #85 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.62 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).