Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 5, 2016·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Anaheim Ducks 3, Los Angeles Kings 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 64% of the time.

LAK winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0112516322
LAK011113110234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:16ANARyan KeslerAssists: Jakob Silfverberg · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 11:14LAKMilan LucicPPAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Jonathan Quick · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1
  3. P2 15:57ANADavid PerronPPAssists: Cam Fowler, Sami Vatanen · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:24ANAJakob SilfverbergPPGWGAssists: Rickard Rakell, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.29 xG3–1
  5. P3 3:27LAKDrew DoughtyPPAssists: Milan Lucic, Anze Kopitar · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 6:58LAKKyle Clifford: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 6:58ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 6:58LAKKris Versteeg: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 6:58ANARickard Rakell: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 6:58LAKAndy Andreoff: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 6:58ANAKevin Bieksa: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 6:58ANACorey Perry: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P1 6:58LAKLuke Schenn: Misconduct10 min
  9. P1 6:58ANAJamie McGinn: Misconduct10 min
  10. P1 6:58ANAKevin Bieksa: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P1 6:58LAKAndy Andreoff: Game misconduct10 min
  12. P1 10:26ANARyan Garbutt: Hooking2 min
  13. P2 9:23ANACam Fowler: Slashing2 min · PPG
  14. P2 15:47LAKTanner Pearson: Holding2 min · PPG
  15. P2 17:23ANARyan Kesler: Slashing2 min
  16. P3 0:53LAKVincent Lecavalier: Interference2 min · PPG
  17. P3 2:53ANANate Thompson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  18. P3 5:51ANAJosh Manson: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win54% to win
← ANA attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Carter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANALAK
22Shots on goal34
1.7Expected goals2.5
39Shot attempts72
30Faceoffs won29
2Power plays6
44Penalty minutes36
31Hits39
15Blocked shots8
6Giveaways7
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – McGinn – Rakell7:41

    xG 0.40–0.19 (68%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perron – Ritchie9:14

    xG 0.29–0.24 (55%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg7:00

    xG 0.08–0.09 (48%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Thompson – Santorelli – Garbutt4:52

    xG 0.07–0.18 (28%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDespres – Vatanen7:57

    xG 0.64–0.38 (63%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  2. Manson – Lindholm11:11

    xG 0.21–0.11 (65%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Fowler2:32

    xG 0.07–0.11 (40%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Lewis – King3:41

    xG 0.16–0.01 (97%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Kopitar – Lucic4:35

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Lecavalier – Toffoli – Pearson3:06

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Brown – King4:07

    xG 0.02–0.01 (70%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchenn – McNabb7:43

    xG 0.43–0.19 (69%)attempts 12–5goals 0–1

  2. Doughty – McNabb3:15

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Muzzin – Doughty6:14

    xG 0.17–0.18 (47%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.5 xGANA 1.7 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #583 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.62 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 64% of the time.

LAK winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).