Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 5, 2016·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Vancouver Canucks 4, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN1121727426
SJS1909116234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:10SJSMicheal HaleyUnassisted · Backhand, 0.30 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:28VANLinden VeyPPAssists: Sven Baertschi, Ben Hutton · Backhand, 0.40 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:12VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Sven Baertschi, Ben Hutton · Snap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:53SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Joe Thornton, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:28VANDan HamhuisPPGWGAssists: Bo Horvat, Jared McCann · Snap, 0.24 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:54VANAlexandre BurrowsENAssists: Luca Sbisa, Bo Horvat · Wrist, 0.72 xG4–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 4:20SJSBrenden Dillon: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 16:45SJSMicheal Haley: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:05SJSJoe Pavelski: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:20VANMatt Bartkowski: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 14:57VANJacob Markstrom: Interference2 min
  6. P2 17:54SJSJoel Ward: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 6:08VANLinden Vey: Holding2 min
  8. P3 8:44SJSJoonas Donskoi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 14:19SJSBrent Burns: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 14:19VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 14:19SJSJoe Thornton: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 19:08SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 19:08SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win54% to win
← VAN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSJS
26Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals2.4
43Shot attempts56
28Faceoffs won40
7Power plays3
8Penalty minutes36
16Hits18
14Blocked shots13
7Giveaways9
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Vey – Gaunce – Horvat2:58

    xG 0.03–0.00 (91%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Etem2:40

    xG 0.03–0.04 (42%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Burrows – Dorsett – McCann3:53

    xG 0.01–0.11 (11%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Vey – Etem8:41

    xG 0.24–0.68 (26%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Tanev – Hutton9:28

    xG 0.17–0.14 (55%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  2. Biega – Sbisa3:48

    xG 0.02–0.06 (21%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Bartkowski6:57

    xG 0.04–0.09 (28%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestZubrus – Haley – Tierney4:03

    xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  2. Marleau – Donskoi – Hertl3:41

    xG 0.62–0.16 (79%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Zubrus – Spaling – Haley3:04

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Pavelski – Hertl6:03

    xG 0.08–0.01 (85%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun9:01

    xG 0.54–0.03 (94%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Vlasic3:04

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 1–0

  3. Martin – Burns8:13

    xG 0.20–0.06 (76%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.4 xGVAN 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #258 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.07 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).