Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 11, 2016·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11021506331
CBJ1819010227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:05CBJGregory CampbellAssists: Jared Boll, Rene Bourque · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:23PITKris LetangPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Phil Kessel · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:45PITChris KunitzAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 2:58CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Ryan Murray, Gregory Campbell · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:47PITCarl HagelinGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Phil Kessel · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 1:35CBJSergei Bobrovsky: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 13:02CBJRene Bourque: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:02CBJJared Boll: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 13:02PITNick Bonino: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 16:03PITOlli Maatta: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 15:40PITSidney Crosby: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  7. P2 18:35CBJRene Bourque: Interference2 min
  8. P3 14:46CBJScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 14:46PITTom Kuhnhackl: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
31Shots on goal27
3.3Expected goals2.0
64Shot attempts45
29Faceoffs won34
3Power plays2
8Penalty minutes10
13Hits26
13Blocked shots14
2Giveaways4
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Fehr – Wilson5:10

    xG 0.41–0.02 (95%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Kessel – Hagelin4:32

    xG 0.31–0.04 (89%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Bonino – Rust – Kuhnhackl6:34

    xG 0.59–0.38 (61%)attempts 13–4goals 0–1

  4. Kessel – Bonino – Hagelin2:03

    xG 0.14–0.05 (75%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDaley – Dumoulin16:00

    xG 0.51–0.22 (70%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  2. Cole – Schultz7:48

    xG 0.41–0.32 (56%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Maatta17:27

    xG 0.90–0.99 (48%)attempts 19–13goals 1–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner12:07

    xG 0.58–0.47 (55%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  2. Hartnell – Bourque – Wennberg3:36

    xG 0.08–0.00 (94%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Calvert – Karlsson7:25

    xG 0.23–0.16 (59%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  4. Campbell – Bourque – Boll2:53

    xG 0.15–0.12 (55%)attempts 1–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Prout7:29

    xG 0.65–0.17 (79%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Prout – Murray3:45

    xG 0.08–0.06 (55%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Jones5:03

    xG 0.11–0.18 (37%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.0 xGPIT 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #586 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).