Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 20, 2016·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Washington Capitals 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 74% of the time.

PIT winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH062606218
PIT21011239631

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:33PITBryan RustAssists: Tom Kuhnhackl, Ian Cole · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:59PITTrevor DaleyAssists: Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:18WSHJason ChimeraAssists: Justin Williams, Dmitry Orlov · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:12WSHAndre BurakovskyAssists: Jay Beagle · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:54PITTom KuhnhacklGWGAssists: Matt Cullen, Trevor Daley · Snap, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:46PITMatt CullenAssists: Tom Kuhnhackl, Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:18PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–5
  8. P3 13:05PITJustin SchultzPPAssists: Trevor Daley, Bryan Rust · Slap, 0.06 xG2–6
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 11:56WSHDaniel Winnik: Interference2 min
  2. P1 15:28WSHT.J. Oshie: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:55PITIan Cole: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P2 13:04WSHMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 13:04WSHMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:04PITBryan Rust: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:22WSHT.J. Oshie: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:22WSHKarl Alzner: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 14:22PITPatric Hornqvist: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 14:22PITPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 18:08WSHJustin Williams: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 10:39WSHMike Weber: Boarding5 min · PPG
  13. P3 10:39WSHMike Weber: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 10:39PITTom Kuhnhackl: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 10:39PITTom Kuhnhackl: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 17:07PITCarl Hagelin: Interference2 min
  17. P3 19:25WSHDaniel Winnik: Elbowing2 min
  18. P3 19:25WSHDaniel Winnik: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win54% to win
← WSH attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHPIT
18Shots on goal31
1.7Expected goals3.0
40Shot attempts51
34Faceoffs won28
2Power plays7
41Penalty minutes22
34Hits32
10Blocked shots15
2Giveaways11
1Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestChimera – Williams – Johansson7:04

    xG 0.52–0.36 (59%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  2. Oshie – Kuznetsov – Burakovsky6:33

    xG 0.20–0.07 (73%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Richards – Winnik – Wilson6:15

    xG 0.24–0.19 (55%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  4. Ovechkin – Backstrom – Beagle7:04

    xG 0.05–0.10 (32%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Orlov – Schmidt4:04

    xG 0.03–0.10 (20%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  2. Weber – Schmidt6:45

    xG 0.14–0.24 (36%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  3. Orpik – Orlov10:15

    xG 0.50–0.63 (44%)attempts 8–12goals 1–3

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Rust – Kuhnhackl9:17

    xG 0.67–0.34 (66%)attempts 8–7goals 3–0

  2. Kunitz – Crosby – Hornqvist10:19

    xG 0.52–0.34 (61%)attempts 11–9goals 2–0

  3. Fehr – Sundqvist – Sheary6:43

    xG 0.22–0.27 (44%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Kessel – Bonino – Hagelin6:52

    xG 0.08–0.26 (24%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Maatta15:24

    xG 0.86–0.33 (72%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Daley – Maatta2:06

    xG 0.04–0.02 (73%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Daley – Dumoulin11:28

    xG 0.47–0.55 (46%)attempts 13–8goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGWSH 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #334 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.47 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 74% of the time.

PIT winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).