Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 24, 2016·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Anaheim Ducks 5, Toronto Maple Leafs 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 78% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA1721421601538
TOR292101611626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:56ANAJamie McGinnPPAssists: Brandon Pirri, Corey Perry · Snap, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:01TORTyler BozakUnassisted · Snap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:55TORNazem KadriPPAssists: Milan Michalek, Connor Brown · Snap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:58TORTyler BozakPPAssists: Nazem Kadri, Morgan Rielly · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:59TORFrank CorradoAssists: Brooks Laich, Ben Smith · Backhand, 0.21 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:54ANAJamie McGinnPPAssists: Brandon Pirri, Ryan Getzlaf · Snap, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P2 19:03ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Josh Manson · Snap, 0.37 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:39ANARyan GarbuttSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.04 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:17ANABrandon PirriAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Hampus Lindholm · Backhand, 0.07 xG5–4
  10. P3 15:37TORConnor BrownPPAssists: Milan Michalek, Nazem Kadri · Backhand, 0.11 xG5–5
  11. OT 0:41TORNazem KadriGWGAssists: Zach Hyman, Morgan Rielly · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 2:22TORZach Hyman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:16ANANick Ritchie: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:11ANANate Thompson: Interference2 min
  4. P2 8:52ANACam Fowler: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 17:39TORMichael Grabner: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  6. P3 4:03ANAHampus Lindholm: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 11:56TORMartin Marincin: Interference2 min
  8. P3 14:57ANAJamie McGinn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 17:17ANAJosh Manson: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P3 17:17TORNazem Kadri: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
47% to win54% to win
← ANA attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horcoff won the faceoff against Bozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATOR
38Shots on goal26
3.4Expected goals1.8
63Shot attempts52
29Faceoffs won31
4Power plays5
20Penalty minutes8
43Hits20
10Blocked shots10
5Giveaways8
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHorcoff – Cogliano – Silfverberg6:05

    xG 0.70–0.06 (92%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Thompson – Santorelli – Garbutt6:00

    xG 0.26–0.05 (85%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  3. Perry – McGinn – Rakell3:32

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Horcoff – Pirri – Ritchie2:14

    xG 0.10–0.01 (88%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm9:45

    xG 1.19–0.50 (70%)attempts 12–15goals 2–1

  2. Holzer – Fowler10:05

    xG 0.55–0.16 (78%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Stoner – Manson2:49

    xG 0.18–0.01 (93%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestParenteau – Hyman – Nylander11:23

    xG 0.29–0.16 (64%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  2. Bozak – Leivo – Brown7:44

    xG 0.27–0.22 (56%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  3. Michalek – Grabner – Kadri11:24

    xG 0.15–0.37 (29%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  4. Laich – Greening – Smith8:28

    xG 0.24–0.58 (29%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Marincin – Rielly15:49

    xG 0.43–0.55 (44%)attempts 17–16goals 0–0

  2. Corrado – Valiev12:25

    xG 0.09–0.64 (12%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

  3. Gardiner – Carrick14:29

    xG 0.25–1.10 (19%)attempts 14–16goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 1.8 xGANA 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #1 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.10 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 78% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).