Fri, Mar 25, 2016·Scottrade Center, St. Louis
Vancouver Canucks 0, St. Louis Blues 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 79% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 07 | 06 | 02 | 015 |
| STL | 211 | 110 | 116 | 437 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 10:51STLKyle BrodziakSHGWGAssists: Scottie Upshall · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–1
- P1 15:25STLRobby FabbriAssists: Paul Stastny, Troy Brouwer · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–2
- P2 15:32STLCarl GunnarssonAssists: Paul Stastny, Troy Brouwer · Slap, 0.03 xG0–3
- P3 12:15STLJoel EdmundsonAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Colton Parayko · Slap, 0.04 xG0–4
Penalties (6)
- P1 8:06VANAndrey Pedan: Holding2 min
- P1 9:45STLKevin Shattenkirk: Slashing2 min
- P1 9:45STLKevin Shattenkirk: Fighting5 min
- P1 9:45VANAlexandre Burrows: Fighting5 min
- P3 0:18VANJannik Hansen: High sticking2 min
- P3 0:23VANDan Hamhuis: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Berglund won the faceoff against Sedin
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestSedin – Sedin – Hansen13:10
xG 0.67–0.53 (56%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
- Baertschi – Horvat – Virtanen10:18
xG 0.22–0.26 (46%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0
- Higgins – Dorsett – Gaunce11:55
xG 0.29–0.46 (38%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1
- Burrows – Vey – Etem9:36
xG 0.14–0.58 (20%)attempts 2–13goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestHamhuis – Bartkowski12:37
xG 0.75–0.25 (75%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0
- Bartkowski – Pedan6:34
xG 0.23–0.26 (46%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0
- Hamhuis – Weber7:22
xG 0.18–0.33 (36%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestUpshall – Brodziak – Reaves10:19
xG 0.68–0.33 (68%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0
- Brouwer – Stastny – Fabbri10:11
xG 0.73–0.39 (65%)attempts 15–5goals 2–0
- Lehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz12:25
xG 0.25–0.18 (59%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0
- Backes – Berglund – Jaskin11:56
xG 0.56–0.50 (53%)attempts 17–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGunnarsson – Parayko12:41
xG 0.82–0.52 (61%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0
- Edmundson – Parayko4:04
xG 0.30–0.06 (85%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0
- Bortuzzo – Edmundson9:03
xG 0.43–0.20 (68%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 79% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (STL − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).