Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 26, 2016·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Dallas Stars 4, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 75% of the time.

SJS winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL152913417
SJS012011213236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:28DALMattias JanmarkAssists: Jordie Benn, Ales Hemsky · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:22DALMattias JanmarkAssists: Jason Spezza, Stephen Johns · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–0
  3. P2 14:19DALPatrick SharpPPGWGAssists: Jason Spezza, John Klingberg · Slap, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P3 3:44SJSJoel WardSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 5:48SJSTomas HertlAssists: Joe Pavelski, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:52DALJamie BennENAssists: Patrick Sharp · Snap, 0.59 xG4–2
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 7:38SJSBrenden Dillon: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 11:55DALAntoine Roussel: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 14:05DALAntoine Roussel: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 14:05SJSTommy Wingels: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 2:36SJSMicheal Haley: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 2:36DALAntoine Roussel: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 6:40DALJohn Klingberg: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 13:41SJSJoe Pavelski: Boarding2 min · PPG
  9. P2 15:35DALStephen Johns: Elbowing2 min
  10. P2 19:56DALJohn Klingberg: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 19:56SJSJoe Thornton: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 0:17DALJamie Benn: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 2:08SJSDylan DeMelo: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 10:09DALAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min
  15. P3 13:24DALMattias Janmark: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win54% to win
← DAL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fiddler won the faceoff against Tierney
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALSJS
17Shots on goal36
1.9Expected goals3.4
33Shot attempts80
32Faceoffs won29
3Power plays6
21Penalty minutes15
22Hits29
20Blocked shots8
15Giveaways15
10Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. Spezza – Janmark – Nichushkin8:16

    xG 0.02–0.07 (24%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Hemsky – Roussel – Faksa6:49

    xG 0.13–0.23 (37%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Fiddler – Eaves – Sceviour6:42

    xG 0.31–0.44 (42%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Benn – Eakin8:45

    xG 0.07–0.65 (10%)attempts 2–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Nemeth – Klingberg7:10

    xG 0.02–0.02 (53%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Benn4:41

    xG 0.11–0.27 (29%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Oduya – Johns11:54

    xG 0.04–0.71 (5%)attempts 3–20goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Hertl10:31

    xG 0.73–0.22 (77%)attempts 22–6goals 1–0

  2. Marleau – Ward – Tierney7:43

    xG 0.25–0.14 (64%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  3. Zubrus – Couture – Karlsson6:43

    xG 0.21–0.12 (63%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  4. Spaling – Haley – Wingels5:48

    xG 0.01–0.12 (9%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Burns10:52

    xG 1.10–0.11 (91%)attempts 27–3goals 1–0

  2. Polak – Dillon12:33

    xG 0.59–0.31 (65%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  3. Braun – DeMelo10:16

    xG 0.09–0.25 (26%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.4 xGDAL 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #436 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.30 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 75% of the time.

SJS winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).