Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 1, 2016·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Winnipeg Jets 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

WPG winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI29171813527
WPG1131122700432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:36WPGNic PetanAssists: Joel Armia, Andrew Copp · Wrist, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:39CHIArtemi PanarinPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Artem Anisimov · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:00CHIBrandon MashinterAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Erik Gustafsson · Deflected, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:08WPGBlake WheelerAssists: Nikolaj Ehlers, Dustin Byfuglien · Backhand, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:22CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Artemi Panarin, Erik Gustafsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:33WPGDustin ByfuglienAssists: Blake Wheeler, Mark Scheifele · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 11:39WPGBlake WheelerAssists: Dustin Byfuglien, Mark Scheifele · Wrap-around, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:15CHIArtemi PanarinAssists: Marcus Kruger, Brent Seabrook · Snap, 0.18 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:02CHIBrent SeabrookGWGAssists: Artemi Panarin, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 4:54CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:48WPGAdam Lowry: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:46CHITrevor van Riemsdyk: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 13:42CHIBrent Seabrook: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 2:05WPGNic Petan: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 3:27WPGDustin Byfuglien: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
47% to win54% to win
← CHI attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Lowry
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIWPG
27Shots on goal32
2.8Expected goals2.1
48Shot attempts62
29Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
13Hits23
19Blocked shots15
12Giveaways9
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestWeise – Mashinter – Teravainen8:11

    xG 0.65–0.09 (88%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Fleischmann – Desjardins – Kruger2:06

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Fleischmann – Ladd – Toews8:48

    xG 0.23–0.34 (41%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin11:00

    xG 0.14–0.29 (32%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Hjalmarsson2:56

    xG 0.22–0.02 (92%)attempts 3–3goals 2–0

  2. Rozsival – Gustafsson8:44

    xG 0.31–0.12 (73%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  3. Seabrook – Svedberg10:56

    xG 0.22–0.21 (51%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestWheeler – Scheifele – Ehlers13:00

    xG 0.73–0.30 (71%)attempts 20–13goals 2–1

  2. Armia – Copp – Petan6:56

    xG 0.51–0.12 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  3. Thorburn – Halischuk – Lowry8:50

    xG 0.02–0.13 (13%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Stafford – Burmistrov – Dano14:20

    xG 0.39–0.55 (41%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPostma – Melchiori10:24

    xG 0.71–0.52 (57%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  2. Byfuglien – Chiarot19:03

    xG 0.54–0.49 (52%)attempts 24–11goals 2–2

  3. Stuart – Trouba15:16

    xG 0.50–0.46 (52%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 2.1 xGCHI 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #29 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.00 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

WPG winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).