Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 2, 2016·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Dallas Stars 3, Los Angeles Kings 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 94% of the time.

LAK winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL11801229339
LAK1818010226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:37LAKTanner PearsonAssists: Luke Schenn, Rob Scuderi · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:57DALJamie BennPPAssists: Patrick Sharp, Jason Spezza · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:50LAKJeff CarterAssists: Tyler Toffoli · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:57DALPatrick EavesUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:02DALJordie BennGWGAssists: Patrik Nemeth, Colton Sceviour · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 12:24LAKKyle Clifford: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:31LAKJake Muzzin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P2 8:46DALAntoine Roussel: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 8:46LAKAndy Andreoff: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 17:14DALPatrick Sharp: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 17:31LAKDrew Doughty: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 6:45DALPatrick Sharp: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win54% to win
← DAL attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carter won the faceoff against Faksa
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALLAK
39Shots on goal26
5.0Expected goals1.5
68Shot attempts53
34Faceoffs won41
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes8
29Hits35
11Blocked shots13
6Giveaways9
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestSpezza – Janmark – Nichushkin8:43

    xG 0.54–0.22 (71%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  2. Hemsky – Roussel – Faksa11:58

    xG 0.39–0.25 (61%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Fiddler – Eaves – Sceviour6:52

    xG 0.13–0.12 (52%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  4. Sharp – Benn – Eakin13:37

    xG 0.12–0.28 (30%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenn – Nemeth13:28

    xG 0.56–0.25 (69%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  2. Oduya – Johns16:43

    xG 0.52–0.42 (55%)attempts 14–15goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Klingberg16:29

    xG 0.45–0.37 (55%)attempts 19–17goals 1–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Kopitar – Pearson10:32

    xG 0.25–0.15 (63%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Versteeg – Clifford – Andreoff6:23

    xG 0.23–0.22 (50%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Lecavalier – Lewis – King8:30

    xG 0.26–0.31 (46%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Lucic – Toffoli13:00

    xG 0.28–0.54 (34%)attempts 16–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Scuderi – Martinez5:49

    xG 0.12–0.08 (61%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Muzzin – Doughty3:35

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Scuderi – Schenn6:27

    xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 1.5 xGDAL 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 59/100 · #480 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 94% of the time.

LAK winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).