Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 3, 2016·United Center, Chicago

Boston Bruins 4, Chicago Blackhawks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS08221217446
CHI21941203634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:14CHIArtem AnisimovPPAssists: Artemi Panarin, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:31CHIPatrick KaneUnassisted · Backhand, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:54CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Artem Anisimov, Artemi Panarin · Tip-in, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:00CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Marian Hossa, Andrew Ladd · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:17CHIArtemi PanarinGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Artem Anisimov · Slap, 0.13 xG0–5
  6. P2 14:16CHIPatrick KanePPAssists: Artemi Panarin, Brent Seabrook · Slap, 0.14 xG0–6
  7. P2 19:44BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: David Krejci, Zdeno Chara · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–6
  8. P2 19:55BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: Adam McQuaid, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–6
  9. P3 2:39BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: Loui Eriksson, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–6
  10. P3 9:51BOSBrad MarchandPPAssists: Torey Krug, Patrice Bergeron · Tip-in, 0.20 xG4–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 11:37BOSDavid Krejci: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 17:46BOSZdeno Chara: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 17:46CHIJonathan Toews: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 5:25CHIErik Gustafsson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 8:02BOSSeth Griffith: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 12:33BOSDavid Pastrnak: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  7. P3 6:56BOSFrank Vatrano: Embellishment2 min
  8. P3 6:56CHITeuvo Teravainen: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win54% to win
← BOS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Krug won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSCHI
46Shots on goal34
2.7Expected goals3.3
76Shot attempts60
36Faceoffs won26
1Power plays3
10Penalty minutes6
31Hits17
17Blocked shots17
5Giveaways10
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson – Bergeron – Marchand10:06

    xG 0.83–0.44 (65%)attempts 19–9goals 2–1

  2. Stempniak – Spooner – Vatrano11:55

    xG 0.36–0.25 (59%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  3. Ferraro – Griffith – Acciari4:39

    xG 0.08–0.02 (81%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Krejci – Beleskey – Pastrnak12:54

    xG 0.40–0.93 (30%)attempts 15–15goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Trotman11:45

    xG 0.50–0.11 (82%)attempts 18–6goals 1–0

  2. McQuaid – Morrow2:26

    xG 0.01–0.08 (16%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Morrow – Krug2:14

    xG 0.06–0.15 (30%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Kane – Panarin11:44

    xG 1.05–0.35 (75%)attempts 14–15goals 2–0

  2. Hossa – Ladd – Toews8:24

    xG 0.74–0.61 (55%)attempts 13–11goals 1–2

  3. Fleischmann – Weise – Teravainen6:39

    xG 0.08–0.08 (50%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  4. Desjardins – Mashinter – Kruger9:09

    xG 0.05–0.39 (10%)attempts 3–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Svedberg13:56

    xG 1.12–0.62 (64%)attempts 16–21goals 2–1

  2. Rozsival – Hjalmarsson4:39

    xG 0.13–0.17 (44%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Seabrook – van Riemsdyk2:42

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.3 xGBOS 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #169 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.62 · 7 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).