Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 7, 2016·Verizon Center, Washington

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Washington Capitals 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 72% of the time.

WSH winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT172901613435
WSH081112902330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:44PITMatt CullenAssists: Tom Kuhnhackl · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:28PITMatt CullenSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:03PITConor ShearyAssists: Oskar Sundqvist, Tom Sestito · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–0
  4. P2 17:19WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: John Carlson, Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 10:05WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Matt Niskanen, Evgeny Kuznetsov · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:26WSHAndre BurakovskyAssists: John Carlson, Justin Williams · Tip-in, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:00PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Kris Letang · Backhand, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:41PITIan Cole: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 19:02PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 2:27WSHTom Wilson: Boarding5 min
  4. P2 11:10PITIan Cole: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P2 13:27WSHJustin Williams: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 13:52PITTrevor Daley: Holding2 min
  7. P2 18:00PITKris Letang: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 18:00WSHAlex Ovechkin: Embellishment2 min
  9. P3 3:14WSHDaniel Winnik: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 5:49WSHMatt Niskanen: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
47% to win54% to win
← PIT attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Backstrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITWSH
35Shots on goal30
3.5Expected goals2.2
56Shot attempts52
33Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes13
19Hits26
12Blocked shots10
10Giveaways18
12Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Bonino – Hagelin9:45

    xG 0.59–0.29 (67%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1

  2. Sestito – Sundqvist – Sheary4:22

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Cullen – Fehr – Kuhnhackl8:10

    xG 0.14–0.13 (53%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

  4. Kunitz – Crosby – Hornqvist10:35

    xG 0.15–0.62 (19%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLovejoy – Dumoulin10:48

    xG 0.47–0.21 (69%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  2. Cole – Schultz8:22

    xG 0.42–0.37 (53%)attempts 6–13goals 0–2

  3. Letang – Cole2:24

    xG 0.02–0.06 (25%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOvechkin – Oshie – Backstrom11:31

    xG 0.36–0.12 (76%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Chimera – Richards – Johansson2:57

    xG 0.27–0.05 (84%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Williams – Kuznetsov – Burakovsky6:53

    xG 0.22–0.23 (49%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  4. Richards – Winnik – Beagle5:07

    xG 0.11–0.20 (36%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Alzner13:57

    xG 0.51–0.29 (64%)attempts 18–10goals 1–0

  2. Orpik – Carlson10:19

    xG 0.41–0.42 (49%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  3. Orpik – Orlov4:13

    xG 0.08–0.13 (38%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.2 xGPIT 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #156 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 72% of the time.

WSH winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).