Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 9, 2016·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 53% of the time.

CBJ winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI380511201426
CBJ010381611525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:09CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Artemi Panarin, Dennis Rasmussen · Snap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:25CHIArtemi PanarinPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Snap, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P1 14:06CHIArtemi PanarinUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–0
  4. P2 6:29CBJScott HartnellAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Brandon Saad · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:55CBJMatt CalvertUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:00CBJBrandon SaadAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Scott Hartnell · Snap, 0.17 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:09CBJAlexander WennbergAssists: Scott Hartnell, Ryan Murray · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:49CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Marcus Kruger, Brent Seabrook · Slap, 0.12 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:28CBJScott HartnellPPGWGAssists: Cam Atkinson, Seth Jones · Tip-in, 0.24 xG4–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 11:12CBJNick Foligno: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:11CBJDavid Savard: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 0:50CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 5:35CBJMatt Calvert: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 16:29CBJNick Foligno: Interference2 min
  6. P3 17:42CBJDavid Savard: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 17:42CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Misconduct10 min
  8. OT 1:34CHITeuvo Teravainen: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win54% to win
← CHI attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Rasmussen won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICBJ
26Shots on goal25
2.7Expected goals2.9
46Shot attempts39
28Faceoffs won32
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes20
10Hits29
7Blocked shots12
5Giveaways3
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBickell – Weise – Teravainen8:31

    xG 0.13–0.03 (79%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Kruger – Panarin2:55

    xG 0.12–0.10 (54%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  3. Ladd – Desjardins – Panik11:04

    xG 0.15–0.28 (35%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Fleischmann – Mashinter – Kruger7:06

    xG 0.16–0.72 (18%)attempts 5–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – van Riemsdyk11:46

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Gustafsson – van Riemsdyk3:51

    xG 0.19–0.02 (90%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Rozsival – Ehrhoff5:52

    xG 0.29–0.25 (53%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Saad – Wennberg10:04

    xG 0.98–0.04 (96%)attempts 9–2goals 3–0

  2. Dubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner11:28

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 8–7goals 0–2

  3. Campbell – Bourque – Boll8:18

    xG 0.05–0.08 (41%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Calvert – Karlsson11:48

    xG 0.21–0.28 (42%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Kukan14:17

    xG 0.89–0.15 (85%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  2. Murray – Jones8:53

    xG 0.59–0.31 (65%)attempts 9–7goals 0–2

  3. Falk – Prout12:55

    xG 0.48–0.22 (69%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.9 xGCHI 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #26 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.30 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 53% of the time.

CBJ winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).