Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 12, 2016·United Center, Chicago

St. Louis Blues 5, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 93% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL09215310534
CHI1613010219

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:38CHIRichard PanikPPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:52STLKevin ShattenkirkPPAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Alexander Steen · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:57CHIRyan HartmanAssists: Tyler Motte, Marcus Kruger · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:28STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Paul Stastny, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 0:55STLPaul StastnyPPGWGAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:54STLVladimir TarasenkoENAssists: Paul Stastny, Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.72 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:41STLScottie UpshallENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.63 xG5–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:31STLRobby Fabbri: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:39STLColton Parayko: Holding2 min
  3. P2 3:01CHITrevor van Riemsdyk: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:54CHIJonathan Toews: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 18:31CHIArtem Anisimov: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 19:28CHIDuncan Keith: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 1:31CHITrevor van Riemsdyk: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 6:22STLPatrik Berglund: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 9:52STLKyle Brodziak: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
44% to win56% to win
← STL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCHI
34Shots on goal19
5.0Expected goals1.7
53Shot attempts39
35Faceoffs won23
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
27Hits22
15Blocked shots8
13Giveaways11
6Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestPerron – Lehtera – Tarasenko11:27

    xG 0.69–0.27 (72%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Upshall – Brodziak – Reaves4:47

    xG 0.53–0.17 (76%)attempts 10–3goals 0–1

  3. Steen – Stastny – Fabbri8:52

    xG 0.18–0.09 (68%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Berglund – Jaskin – Yakupov9:11

    xG 0.05–0.15 (25%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Bortuzzo11:22

    xG 0.59–0.28 (68%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  2. Edmundson – Parayko11:34

    xG 0.30–0.06 (84%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo16:35

    xG 0.54–0.43 (56%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Kane – Panarin12:14

    xG 0.35–0.22 (62%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Kruger – Motte – Hartman5:55

    xG 0.17–0.09 (66%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Hossa – Toews – Panik8:57

    xG 0.14–0.11 (56%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Tootoo – Hinostroza – Schmaltz4:21

    xG 0.00–0.29 (0%)attempts 0–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook2:42

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Campbell – Forsling11:10

    xG 0.24–0.20 (55%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  3. Seabrook – Kempny13:23

    xG 0.35–0.54 (39%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 1.7 xGSTL 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #310 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.88 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 93% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).