Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 13, 2016·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Boston Bruins 6, Columbus Blue Jackets 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS011316310637
CBJ2911309331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:58CBJAlexander WennbergAssists: Seth Jones, Zach Werenski · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:25CBJCam AtkinsonPPAssists: Nick Foligno, Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.22 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:36BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Brad Marchand · Snap, 0.30 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:44CBJSeth JonesAssists: Brandon Saad, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:36BOSDavid BackesAssists: Zdeno Chara, Brad Marchand · Snap, 0.22 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:12BOSDavid BackesAssists: David Pastrnak, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P3 9:54BOSBrad MarchandGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, David Backes · Snap, 0.37 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:25BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Brandon Carlo · Snap, 0.15 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:02BOSDavid PastrnakENAssists: David Krejci, Ryan Spooner · Snap, 0.72 xG6–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:43BOSDavid Backes: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 2:43CBJJosh Anderson: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 17:08BOSAustin Czarnik: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:05CBJBoone Jenner: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:14CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:37BOSDanton Heinen: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 2:55BOSNoel Acciari: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
44% to win56% to win
← BOS attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSCBJ
37Shots on goal31
5.1Expected goals3.5
60Shot attempts63
35Faceoffs won30
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
14Hits29
23Blocked shots15
2Giveaways9
9Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBackes – Marchand – Pastrnak11:42

    xG 2.04–1.10 (65%)attempts 22–17goals 5–0

  2. Beleskey – Hayes – Czarnik6:42

    xG 0.22–0.11 (67%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  3. Beleskey – Nash – Hayes3:06

    xG 0.09–0.06 (62%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Moore – Nash – Acciari5:51

    xG 0.20–0.23 (46%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Carlo13:53

    xG 1.63–0.45 (78%)attempts 19–11goals 5–1

  2. O'Gara – Krug12:18

    xG 0.50–0.21 (71%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

  3. Liles – Krug2:07

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner11:39

    xG 1.27–0.72 (64%)attempts 19–11goals 0–2

  2. Foligno – Gagner – Saad8:24

    xG 0.11–0.25 (31%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  3. Hartnell – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg9:23

    xG 0.09–0.29 (24%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

  4. Calvert – Karlsson – Anderson7:46

    xG 0.17–0.76 (18%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Murray13:44

    xG 0.97–0.92 (52%)attempts 13–20goals 0–1

  2. Jones – Werenski15:53

    xG 0.61–0.96 (39%)attempts 23–13goals 1–3

  3. Johnson – Nutivaara11:07

    xG 0.07–0.64 (10%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.5 xGBOS 5.1 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #161 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.76 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).