Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 16, 2016·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 6, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 71% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF2102628624
EDM210011012233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:37BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Sam Reinhart, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:14BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Kyle Okposo, Rasmus Ristolainen · Snap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:20EDMBenoit PouliotAssists: Zack Kassian, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:00EDMMilan LucicAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Jordan Eberle · Wrist, 0.29 xG2–2
  5. P2 3:53BUFRyan O'ReillyGWGAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Cody Franson · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:22BUFBrian GiontaAssists: Jake McCabe, Marcus Foligno · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–2
  7. P3 0:37BUFBrian GiontaAssists: Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–2
  8. P3 4:36BUFMatt MoulsonPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Rasmus Ristolainen · Snap, 0.10 xG6–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:25EDMBenoit Pouliot: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:21EDMBenoit Pouliot: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 4:16EDMEric Gryba: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P3 4:16EDMEric Gryba: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P3 4:16BUFJake McCabe: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P3 8:23EDMPatrick Maroon: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P3 11:59EDMEric Gryba: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 12:29EDMAnton Lander: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 13:58EDMDarnell Nurse: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 13:58BUFDerek Grant: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 14:25BUFCody Franson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
44% to win56% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
24Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals3.9
44Shot attempts58
31Faceoffs won29
6Power plays1
6Penalty minutes16
14Hits32
15Blocked shots11
5Giveaways12
1Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Girgensons – Fasching3:52

    xG 0.20–0.05 (79%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson12:48

    xG 0.51–0.38 (57%)attempts 9–15goals 2–0

  3. Okposo – O'Reilly – Reinhart10:52

    xG 0.32–0.34 (49%)attempts 8–7goals 2–0

  4. Ennis – Grant – Deslauriers5:27

    xG 0.03–0.13 (19%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Kulikov2:49

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Bogosian – McCabe14:32

    xG 0.49–0.31 (61%)attempts 8–13goals 3–0

  3. Kulikov – Ristolainen2:18

    xG 0.09–0.15 (37%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestPouliot – Kassian – Nugent-Hopkins4:22

    xG 0.64–0.12 (84%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Maroon – Draisaitl – McDavid9:58

    xG 0.51–0.11 (82%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  3. Lucic – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins10:18

    xG 0.46–0.11 (80%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

  4. Letestu – Kassian – Puljujarvi2:08

    xG 0.18–0.04 (81%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSekera – Russell16:20

    xG 0.97–0.28 (78%)attempts 17–9goals 1–1

  2. Larsson – Nurse3:54

    xG 0.26–0.11 (70%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

  3. Larsson – Klefbom12:14

    xG 0.56–0.44 (56%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.9 xGBUF 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #338 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.23 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 71% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).